Literature DB >> 33536844

Metrics Used to Quantify Fecal Incontinence and Constipation.

Cameron W Hunt1, Paul M Cavallaro1, Liliana G Bordeianou2.   

Abstract

While fecal incontinence and constipation can be measured through physiological testing, the subjective experience of severity and impact on health-related quality of life lead to both being most effectively captured through patient-reported measures. Patient-reported measures of severity and impact help to determine baseline symptoms, guide clinical decision making, and compare various treatments. Here, we take pause to review the psychometric qualities that make effective instruments, and discuss some of the most commonly used instruments along with the reasons behind their use. In addition, we highlight the benefits of a standardized instrument designed to evaluate the major symptoms of patients presenting with pelvic floor disorders (including fecal incontinence and constipation). Ultimately, we aim to provide guidance in choosing appropriate instruments for clinical and research use. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  constipation metrics; fecal incontinence metrics; patient-reported outcomes; severity measures

Year:  2021        PMID: 33536844      PMCID: PMC7843947          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  40 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems.

Authors:  C J Vaizey; E Carapeti; J A Cahill; M A Kamm
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Evaluation of a questionnaire in the assessment of patients with faecal incontinence and constipation.

Authors:  A Osterberg; W Graf; U Karlbom; L Påhlman
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Anastasio; C Bottini; A Mentasti
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma.

Authors:  A J Malouf; C S Norton; A F Engel; R J Nicholls; M A Kamm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods.

Authors:  Lori D McLeod; Cheryl D Coon; Susan A Martin; Sheri E Fehnel; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 7.  Measuring fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; David A Rothenberger; Ann C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  Incontinence severity and QOL scales for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Todd H Rockwood
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  The constipation severity instrument: a validated measure.

Authors:  Madhulika G Varma; Jennifer Y Wang; Julia R Berian; Taryn R Patterson; G Lindsay McCrea; Stacey L Hart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Review article: self-report measures to evaluate constipation.

Authors:  G L McCrea; C Miaskowski; N A Stotts; L Macera; S A Hart; M G Varma
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 8.171

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Charles H Knowles; Isabelle Mack; Allison Malcolm; Nicholas Oblizajek; Satish Rao; S Mark Scott; Andrea Shin; Paul Enck
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 65.038

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.