Literature DB >> 10428927

Evaluation of low-dose, extended-interval clindamycin regimens against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae using a dynamic in vitro model of infection.

R E Lewis1, M E Klepser, E J Ernst, B C Lund, D J Biedenbach, R N Jones.   

Abstract

We have previously described the activity of low-dose clindamycin in extended-interval dosing regimens by determination of bactericidal titer in serum. In this study, we used a one-compartment in vitro dynamic infection model to compare the pharmacodynamics of clindamycin in three intravenous-dosing regimens (600 mg every 8 h [q8h], 300 mg q8h, and 300 mg q12h) against three clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and two clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Test organisms were added to the central compartment of the model to yield a starting inoculum of 10(6) CFU/ml. Clindamycin was injected as a bolus into the central compartment at appropriate times over 48 h to simulate the q8h or q12h dosing regimens. Drug-free culture medium was then pumped through the system to mimic a half-life of 2.4 h. At predetermined time points during the experiment, samples were removed from the central compartments for colony count determination and drug concentration analysis. The rates of killing did not significantly differ among the three clindamycin dosing regimens against either S. aureus or S. pneumoniae (P = 0.88 or 0.998, respectively). Likewise, no significant differences in activities were detected among the three regimens against staphylococci (P = 0.677 and 0.667) or pneumococci (P = 0.88 and 0.99). Against an S. aureus isolate exhibiting inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance, none of the three clindamycin regimens prevented regrowth of the resistance phenotype in the model. In this model, clindamycin administered at a low dose in an extended-interval regimen (300 mg q12h) exhibited antibacterial activity equivalent to that of the 300- or 600-mg-q8h regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10428927      PMCID: PMC89405     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  15 in total

1.  The E-Test applied to susceptibility tests of gonococci, multiply-resistant enterococci, and Enterobacteriaceae producing potent beta-lactamases.

Authors:  M L Sanchez; M S Barrett; R N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  Protein binding of clindamycin in sera of patients with AIDS.

Authors:  J F Flaherty; G Gatti; J White; J Bubp; M Borin; J G Gambertoglio
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Variation in postantibiotic effect of clindamycin against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and implications for dosing of patients with osteomyelitis.

Authors:  I B Xue; P G Davey; G Phillips
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for management. The Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  J G Bartlett; R F Breiman; L A Mandell; T M File
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Selecting clindamycin dosage regimens.

Authors:  B Ameer; P Sesin; A W Karchmer
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1987-09

Review 6.  In vitro models for the study of antibiotic activities.

Authors:  J Blaser; S H Zinner
Journal:  Prog Drug Res       Date:  1987

7.  Mathematical corrections for bacterial loss in pharmacodynamic in vitro dilution models.

Authors:  S Keil; B Wiedemann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  New in vitro model to study the effect of antibiotic concentration and rate of elimination on antibacterial activity.

Authors:  S Grasso; G Meinardi; I de Carneri; V Tamassia
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Characterization of bactericidal activity of clindamycin against Bacteroides fragilis via kill curve methods.

Authors:  M E Klepser; M A Banevicius; R Quintiliani; C H Nightingale
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Meta-analysis of parenteral clindamycin dosing regimens.

Authors:  J P Rovers; A L Ilersich; T R Einarson
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Selecting antibacterials for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy : pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  Richard S Slavik; Peter J Jewesson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Activities of clindamycin, daptomycin, doxycycline, linezolid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with inducible clindamycin resistance in murine thigh infection and in vitro pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  Kerry L LaPlante; Steven N Leonard; David R Andes; William A Craig; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A Pharmacoepidemiologic Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Clindamycin in Infants.

Authors:  Rachel G Greenberg; Huali Wu; Anil Maharaj; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Kay M Tomashek; Blaire L Osborn; Reese H Clark; Emmanuel B Walter
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.806

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.