Literature DB >> 1643825

The E-Test applied to susceptibility tests of gonococci, multiply-resistant enterococci, and Enterobacteriaceae producing potent beta-lactamases.

M L Sanchez1, M S Barrett, R N Jones.   

Abstract

The E-Test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), a new and novel approach developed to test antimicrobial susceptibility, was compared with the agar dilution method. A collection of 57 organisms, including those with known resistances to various antimicrobial agents was tested against 15 drugs using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standard (NCCLS) methods. The E-Test quantitative accuracy (+/- 2 log2 dilutions) compared with agar dilution results was 99% for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, 95% for Escherichia coli strains with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, 100% for Enterobacter-Citrobacter spp. with type-1 stably derepressed enzymes, and 95% for Enterococcus spp. with various drug resistances (penicillins, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and vancomycin). The E-Test procedures with these species were easy to perform, reproducible, and quantitatively and qualitatively accurate (89%-100%). The E-Test appears to be an acceptable option for susceptibility testing of these difficult-to-treat, drug-resistant bacterial strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1643825     DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90090-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  15 in total

Review 1.  Is it important to identify extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing isolates?

Authors:  K Bush
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Rapid increase in the prevalence of antimicrobial drug resistance among enterococcal blood isolates in southern Israel.

Authors:  N Marcus; N Peled; P Yagupsky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance.

Authors:  N Woodford; A P Johnson; D Morrison; D C Speller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Comparison of Etest and agar dilution method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Flavobacterium isolates.

Authors:  P R Hsueh; J C Chang; L J Teng; P C Yang; S W Ho; W C Hsieh; K T Luh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Preliminary safety evaluation of a new Bacteroides xylanisolvens isolate.

Authors:  Philippe Ulsemer; Kawe Toutounian; Jens Schmidt; Uwe Karsten; Steffen Goletz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evaluation of Etest for testing antimicrobial susceptibilities of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with different growth media.

Authors:  K H Yeung; L K Ng; J A Dillon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of low-dose, extended-interval clindamycin regimens against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae using a dynamic in vitro model of infection.

Authors:  R E Lewis; M E Klepser; E J Ernst; B C Lund; D J Biedenbach; R N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  E test as susceptibility test and epidemiologic tool for evaluation of Neisseria meningitidis isolates.

Authors:  J H Hughes; D J Biedenbach; M E Erwin; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Reliability of the E test for detection of ampicillin, vancomycin, and high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus spp.

Authors:  J E Schulz; D F Sahm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Use of the E test to predict high-level resistance to aminoglycosides among enterococci.

Authors:  M L Sanchez; M S Barrett; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.