Literature DB >> 10428196

Patterns and characteristics of repeat mammography among women 50 years and older.

M Ulcickas Yood1, B D McCarthy, N C Lee, G Jacobsen, C C Johnson.   

Abstract

Whereas efforts encouraging women to obtain initial mammograms are laudable, the importance of returning for subsequent routine mammograms cannot be minimized. The purpose of this study was to measure the timing, patterns, and characteristics of repeat screening mammography over time in a defined population of health maintenance organization members for whom mammography was a fully covered benefit. We identified all women ages 50-74 years who were enrolled in a southeastern Michigan health maintenance organization, assigned to a large medical group, and received at least one screening mammogram with a normal result between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 1996. Using administrative and radiology data, we calculated the proportion of women who received a subsequent mammogram within 2 years and the time to subsequent screening, both overall and stratified by demographic characteristics. We also examined screening patterns over a 5-year period. Of the 8749 women included in this study, 66.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 65.0-67.0%] were subsequently screened within 2 years. We found slightly higher rates among Caucasians and married women. The proportion of women who received repeat mammography increased with estimated household income [9.5% difference between the highest and lowest categories (95% CI, 6.5-12.5%)]. The median time to subsequent screening was 17.7 months, and the probability of repeat screening was higher for women whose initial mammogram was between January 1992 and December 1994 compared to those receiving an initial mammogram between January 1989 and December 1991 (9.6% difference; 95% CI, 7.5-11.7%). Repeat mammography has improved over time; however, socioeconomic status could contribute to longer-than-intended intervals between screening when translated into real-world clinical practice. In a setting where most physicians recommended annual screening, we found that the median time to subsequent screening was delayed by 6 months. If annual mammography is the goal, recommendations should be made with the understanding of how the timing of repeat screening occurs in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10428196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  20 in total

1.  The relation of household income to mammography utilization in a prepaid health care system.

Authors:  M B Barton; S Moore; E Shtatland; R Bright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population.

Authors:  Carol P Somkin; Stephen J McPhee; Tung Nguyen; Susan Stewart; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Rena Pasick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women.

Authors:  Alecia Malin Fair; Debra Wujcik; Jin-Mann Sally Lin; Wei Zheng; Kathleen M Egan; Ana M Grau; Victoria L Champion; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

4.  The influence of type and severity of mental illness on receipt of screening mammography.

Authors:  Caroline P Carney; Laura E Jones
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The relation between projected breast cancer risk, perceived cancer risk, and mammography use. Results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  C P Gross; G Filardo; H S Singh; A N Freedman; M H Farrell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Linn A Abraham; Jessica S Fosse; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Lower adherence to screening mammography guidelines among ethnic minority women in America: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Rebecca J Purc-Stephenson; Kevin M Gorey
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Casey L Luce; Evette Ludman; Amy E Bonomi; Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in Appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Traci LeMasters; Elvonna Atkins; Sara Gainor; Stephenie Kennedy; Kimberly Kelly; Linda Vona-Davis; Scot Remick
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

10.  Family history of cancer and its association with breast cancer risk perception and repeat mammography.

Authors:  Gillian Haber; Nasar U Ahmed; Vukosava Pekovic
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.