Literature DB >> 10424679

Psychophysical assessment of the affective components of non-painful touch.

G K Essick1, A James, F P McGlone.   

Abstract

A novel psychophysical procedure for the evaluation of the affective components of touch was developed. A fabric material was stroked across the test site at a controlled direction and velocity, after which the subject provided a numerical estimate of pleasantness. Significant differences were detected for the sites tested (FACE vs ARM), the fabric materials used (VELVET, COTTON and PLASTIC MESH), and the velocity of motion (0.5, 5 and 50 cm/s). Attesting to their validity, estimates of pleasantness correlated negatively with estimates of unpleasantness obtained for the same stimuli. Moreover, subjects were reasonably consistent in their ratings upon stimulus replication. These findings demonstrate that the hedonic qualities of touch can be psychophysically evaluated, and that valid and reliable estimates are obtained.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10424679     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199907130-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  33 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in brain activations and functional connectivity during affectively different tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Qing-Ping Hua; Xiang-Zhu Zeng; Jian-Yu Liu; Jin-Yan Wang; Jian-You Guo; Fei Luo
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 2.  The skin as a social organ.

Authors:  India Morrison; Line S Löken; Håkan Olausson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Brain Mechanisms for Processing Affective (and Nonaffective) Touch Are Atypical in Autism.

Authors:  Martha D Kaiser; Daniel Y-J Yang; Avery C Voos; Randi H Bennett; Ilanit Gordon; Charlotte Pretzsch; Danielle Beam; Cara Keifer; Jeffrey Eilbott; Francis McGlone; Kevin A Pelphrey
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Emotional visual stimuli affect the evaluation of tactile stimuli presented on the arms but not the related electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Roberta Etzi; Massimiliano Zampini; Georgiana Juravle; Alberto Gallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.526

6.  Report of altered sensation in patients with cleft lip.

Authors:  Greg K Essick; Craig Dorion; Seth Rumley; Lyna Rogers; Michael Young; Carroll-Ann Trotman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2005-03

7.  Self-reported Pleasantness Ratings and Examiner-Coded Defensiveness in Response to Touch in Children with ASD: Effects of Stimulus Material and Bodily Location.

Authors:  Carissa J Cascio; Jill Lorenzi; Grace T Baranek
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-05

8.  Rasch-Built Measure of Pleasant Touch through Active Fingertip Exploration.

Authors:  Anne Klöcker; Carlyne Arnould; Massimo Penta; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Cochlear SGN neurons elevate pain thresholds in response to music.

Authors:  R I M Dunbar; Eiluned Pearce; Bronwyn Tarr; Adarsh Makdani; Joshua Bamford; Sharon Smith; Francis McGlone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Feel-Good Requirements: Neurophysiological and Psychological Design Criteria of Affective Touch for (Assistive) Robots.

Authors:  Mehmet Ege Cansev; Daniel Nordheimer; Elsa Andrea Kirchner; Philipp Beckerle
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.