Literature DB >> 10420626

Growth of simultaneous masking for fm < fs: effects of overall frequency and level.

S P Bacon1, L N Boden, J Lee, J L Repovsch.   

Abstract

Growth-of-masking (GOM) functions were obtained in three groups of normal-hearing subjects using a simultaneous-masking paradigm. In all cases, the signal frequency (fs) was higher than the masker frequency (fm), either by a certain ratio (1.44) or by a certain distance [3 equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs)]. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of overall frequency on the slope of the steep portion of the GOM function, and to evaluate the change in slope that can occur at high levels. Signal frequency ranged from 400 to 5000 Hz, and masker level ranged from 40 to 95 dB SPL. On average, the slope of the steep portion of the GOM function was about 1.4 for signal frequencies from 400 to 750 Hz, and 2.0 for signal frequencies from 1944 to 5000 Hz. This is consistent with the possibility that the cochlea may behave more linearly at the apical (low-frequency) region than at the basal (high-frequency) region. In addition, for signal frequencies at and above 750 Hz, the slope of the masking function changed from a value much greater than 1.0 to a value of 1.0 at high levels. The change in slope was better correlated with signal sensation level (i.e., amount of masking) than with either signal or masker SPL: the lack of a change at the lower signal frequencies may reflect the smaller amounts of masking there. The change to a linear growth of masking may represent a change in the response to the signal from compressive to linear at high levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10420626     DOI: 10.1121/1.427060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

2.  Level-dependent masking of the auditory evoked responses in a dolphin: manifestation of the compressive nonlinearity.

Authors:  Vladimir V Popov; Dmitry I Nechaev; Evgenia V Sysueva; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Harisadhan Patra; Judy Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Contribution of Cochlear Compression to Discrimination of Rippled Spectra in On- and Low-frequency Noise.

Authors:  Olga N Milekhina; Dmitry I Nechaev; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-21

5.  Masking of short tones in noise: Evidence for envelope-based, rather than energy-based detection.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.