Literature DB >> 10419353

An evidence-based review of decompressive surgery in acute spinal cord injury: rationale, indications, and timing based on experimental and clinical studies.

M G Fehlings1, C H Tator.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors conducted an evidence-based review of the literature to evaluate critically the rationale and indications for and the timing of decompressive surgery for the treatment of acute, nonpenetrating spinal cord injury (SCI).
METHODS: The experimental and clinical literature concerning the role of, and the biological rationale for, surgical decompression for acute SCI was reviewed. Clinical studies of nonoperative management of SCI were also examined for comparative purposes. Evidence from clinical trials was categorized as Class I (well-conducted randomized prospective trials), Class II (well-designed comparative clinical studies), or Class II (retrospective studies). Examination of studies in which animal models of SCI were used consistently demonstrated a beneficial effect of early decompressive surgery, although it is difficult to apply these data directly to the clinical setting. The clinical studies provided suggestive (Class III and limited Class II) evidence that decompressive procedures improve neurological recovery after SCI. However, no clear consensus can be inferred from the literature as to the optimum timing for decompressive surgery. Many authors have advocated delayed treatment to avoid medical complications, although good evidence from recent Class II trials indicates that early decompressive surgery can be performed safely without causing added morbidity or mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: There is biological evidence from experimental studies in animals that early decompressive surgery may improve neurological recovery after SCI, although the relevant interventional timing in humans remains unclear. To date, the role of surgical decompression in patients with SCI is only supported by Class III and limited Class II evidence. Accordingly, decompressive surgery for SCI can only be considered a practice option. Furthermore, analysis of the literature does not allow definite conclusions to be drawn regarding appropriate timing of intervention. Hence, there is a need to conduct well-designed experimental and clinical studies of the timing and neurological results of decompressive surgery for the treatment of acute SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10419353     DOI: 10.3171/spi.1999.91.1.0001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  28 in total

1.  Acute Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  [Management of spine injuries in polytraumatized patients].

Authors:  C E Heyde; W Ertel; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Identification of serum exosomal microRNAs in acute spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Shu-Qin Ding; Jing Chen; Sai-Nan Wang; Fei-Xiang Duan; Yu-Qing Chen; Yu-Jiao Shi; Jian-Guo Hu; He-Zuo Lü
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-08-26

Review 4.  Current and future medical therapeutic strategies for the functional repair of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Tevfik Yılmaz; Erkan Kaptanoğlu
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

5.  Compression induces acute demyelination and potassium channel exposure in spinal cord.

Authors:  Hui Ouyang; Wenjing Sun; Yan Fu; Jianming Li; Ji-Xin Cheng; Eric Nauman; Riyi Shi
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Efficacy of surgical decompression in regard to motor recovery in the setting of conus medullaris injury.

Authors:  Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Alexander R Vaccaro; Mehdi Mohammadi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 7.  Timing of thoracic and lumbar fracture fixation in spinal injuries: a systematic review of neurological and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jozef Paulus Henricus Johannes Rutges; F Cumhur Oner; Luke Peter Hendrik Leenen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Combined posterior-anterior stabilisation of thoracolumbar injuries utilising a vertebral body replacing implant.

Authors:  Christian Knop; T Kranabetter; M Reinhold; M Blauth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The effects of trauma center care, admission volume, and surgical volume on paralysis after traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Carlos Aitor Macias; Matthew R Rosengart; Juan-Carlos Puyana; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Wade Smith; Andrew B Peitzman; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Basic advances and new avenues in therapy of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin; Leif A Havton
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 13.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.