Literature DB >> 10414742

Penile implant success in patients with corporal fibrosis using multiple incisions and minimal scar tissue excision.

A Rajpurkar1, H Li, C B Dhabuwala.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish the efficacy of "minimal scar tissue excision" in the treatment of penile fibrosis.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients with extensive penile fibrosis who underwent placement of penile implant from October 1989 to April 1998 were evaluated by a chart review of the patient's follow-up data. Function of the implant was evaluated at follow-up visits. The follow-up ranged from 4 to 84 months (mean 23.7, median 22). All patients had undergone minimal scar tissue excision of the fibrous tissue in the penis.
RESULTS: All patients underwent successful introduction of the penile implant, and in no patient was the procedure abandoned because of technical difficulty. Intraoperatively, 1 patient developed a tear in the crus. It was not recognized during the initial operation but was repaired at a subsequent date by Gore-Tex grafting. The Uniflate prosthesis of another patient failed 2 years after the initial surgery and was replaced with the Mentor alpha-1 implant. None of the patients developed infection. All the patients had a functioning implant at the time of last review.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimal scar tissue excision is a safe and effective method in the management of extensive penile fibrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10414742     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00060-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

Review 1.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Strategies for penile prosthesis placement in Peyronie's disease and corporal fibrosis.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; Premsant Sangkum; Ian Ross McCaslin; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Use of a microdebrider for corporeal excavation and penile prosthesis implantation in men with severely fibrosed corpora cavernosa: a new minimal invasive surgical technique.

Authors:  İbrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tarık Yonguç; Özgü Aydoğdu; Tansu Değirmenci; Murat Arslan; Süleyman Minareci
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-09

4.  Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Men with Severe Intracorporal Fibrosis.

Authors:  Bruce B Garber; Caitlin Lim
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-05-30

5.  Nonpharmacologic treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Drogo K Montague
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

Review 6.  Multicenter surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement in patients with corporal fibrosis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kevin Krughoff; Priyanka Bearelly; Michel Apoj; Nicolas A Munarriz; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Shu Pan; Martin S Gross; Ricardo M Munarriz
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 7.  Penile prosthesis implant in the special populations: diabetics, neurogenic conditions, fibrotic cases, concurrent urinary continence surgery, and salvage implants.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Current status of penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  D K Montague; K W Angermeier
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.862

9.  A preliminary report on combined penoscrotal and perineal approach for placement of penile prosthesis with corporal fibrosis.

Authors:  John P Brusky; Viet Q Tran; Jocelyn M Rieder; Sherif R Aboseif
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008-11-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.