Bruce B Garber1, Caitlin Lim1. 1. Hahnemann University Hospital, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa., USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively review a series of men who underwent attempted inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion into severely scarred corpora, and to analyze the surgical techniques and instruments that contributed to a successful outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All IPP procedures done by a high-volume prosthetic surgeon during a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen patients with severe intracorporal fibrosis underwent 15 attempted IPP insertion procedures, and are the subject of this review. RESULTS: A standardized surgical approach was employed for all patients. Thirteen of the 15 procedures were successful (i.e., an IPP was inserted, with satisfactory cylinder position). One procedure failed due to corporal obliteration. One patient underwent an initial failed attempt, but was successfully implanted 10 months later. Two of the 14 patients (14%) developed peri-prosthetic infection and were explanted. CONCLUSION: IPP insertion into scarred corpora is difficult and occasionally impossible. We have developed a standardized surgical approach for these cases, using limited corporal excavation, followed by the use of sequential Uramix and then Carrion-Rossello cavernotomes, that we feel has improved our chance of a successful implant. However, due to the rarity of these cases, it is not possible to make definitive statements concerning the optimal surgical technique.
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively review a series of men who underwent attempted inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion into severely scarred corpora, and to analyze the surgical techniques and instruments that contributed to a successful outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All IPP procedures done by a high-volume prosthetic surgeon during a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen patients with severe intracorporal fibrosis underwent 15 attempted IPP insertion procedures, and are the subject of this review. RESULTS: A standardized surgical approach was employed for all patients. Thirteen of the 15 procedures were successful (i.e., an IPP was inserted, with satisfactory cylinder position). One procedure failed due to corporal obliteration. One patient underwent an initial failed attempt, but was successfully implanted 10 months later. Two of the 14 patients (14%) developed peri-prosthetic infection and were explanted. CONCLUSION: IPP insertion into scarred corpora is difficult and occasionally impossible. We have developed a standardized surgical approach for these cases, using limited corporal excavation, followed by the use of sequential Uramix and then Carrion-Rossello cavernotomes, that we feel has improved our chance of a successful implant. However, due to the rarity of these cases, it is not possible to make definitive statements concerning the optimal surgical technique.
Authors: Eduardo J A Lopes; Andre Y Kuwano; Andreia N Guimaraes; Jesuino P Flores; Modesto A O Jacobino Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Kevin Krughoff; Priyanka Bearelly; Michel Apoj; Nicolas A Munarriz; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Shu Pan; Martin S Gross; Ricardo M Munarriz Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 2.896