Literature DB >> 10405059

Perinatal outcome in hospital and birth center obstetric care.

M David1, H K von Schwarzenfeld, J A Dimer, H Kentenich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare birth complications and fetal outcome in hospitals and birth centers.
METHOD: We retrospectively compared all 801 deliveries between 1992 and 1994 from two free-standing birth centers against 3271 hospital deliveries in Berlin. The hospital collective was selected according to the same risk criteria of the birth centers.
RESULTS: The birth center group had significantly fewer medical interventions, with a similar cesarean section rate (3.0% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.057) and occurrence of severe perineal lesions. The episiotomy rate was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the clinics for first-time and multiple births. The perinatal mortality was not significantly different ( < 0.1 per 1000). One-minute Apgar scores less than 7 were found significantly more often in the birth center group.
CONCLUSION: When birth centers employ thorough risk selection and significant early referral rates to nearby hospitals, there is no evidence of increased maternal or perinatal risk compared to hospital deliveries.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10405059     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00038-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  7 in total

1.  Physician-led, hospital-linked, birth care centers can decrease cesarean section rates without increasing rates of adverse events.

Authors:  Margaret H O'Hara; Linda M Frazier; Travis W Stembridge; Robert S McKay; Sandra N Mohr; Stuart L Shalat
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 2.  [Effectiveness of liberal vs. conservative episiotomy in vaginal delivery with reference to preventing urinary and fecal incontinence: a systematic review].

Authors:  Gabriele Schlömer; Mechthild Gross; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2003

3.  Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women.

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Anna Margrethe Møller; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Lisbeth B Knudsen; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Preferences for birth center care in the Netherlands: an exploration of ethnic differences.

Authors:  Dominique Lescure; Sanneke Schepman; Ronald Batenburg; Therese A Wiegers; Ellen Verbakel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączek; Urszula Tataj-Puzyna; Dorota Sys; Barbara Baranowska
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2020-04-18

7.  Optimal outcome factors in maternity and newborn care for inpatient (hospital maternity ward-HMW) and outpatient deliveries (outhospital maternity clinics -OMC).

Authors:  Azra Lukač; Nenad Šulović; Aleksandra Ilić; Milica Mijović; Dijana Tasić; Sonja Smiljić
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.