OBJECTIVE: To determine the variability in annual Mini-Mental State Examination scores of patients with Alzheimer disease enrolled in the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). PATIENTS: A total of 372 patients with probable Alzheimer disease with 1 or more years of follow-up. SETTING: Twenty-one CERAD clinical sites throughout the United States. RESULTS: An average annual decline of 3.4 points in CERAD patients returning for longitudinal reassessments was close to the SD of the measurement error of 2.8 points for the Mini-Mental State Examination. There was wide variability in individual rates of decline. Even with 4 years of follow-up, 15.8% of the patients had no clinically meaningful decline in Mini-Mental State Examination score (defined as a change in initial score >3, ie, 1 SD of measurement error). Validity of measurements of the rate of change in Mini-Mental State Examination scores improved with longer observation intervals and was reliable for most patients when observations were separated by 3 or more years. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Mini-Mental State Examination is a useful screening instrument to assess level of cognitive function, it has limited value in measuring the progression of Alzheimer disease in individual patients for periods less than 3 years because of a large measurement error and substantial variation in change in annual score.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the variability in annual Mini-Mental State Examination scores of patients with Alzheimer disease enrolled in the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). PATIENTS: A total of 372 patients with probable Alzheimer disease with 1 or more years of follow-up. SETTING: Twenty-one CERAD clinical sites throughout the United States. RESULTS: An average annual decline of 3.4 points in CERAD patients returning for longitudinal reassessments was close to the SD of the measurement error of 2.8 points for the Mini-Mental State Examination. There was wide variability in individual rates of decline. Even with 4 years of follow-up, 15.8% of the patients had no clinically meaningful decline in Mini-Mental State Examination score (defined as a change in initial score >3, ie, 1 SD of measurement error). Validity of measurements of the rate of change in Mini-Mental State Examination scores improved with longer observation intervals and was reliable for most patients when observations were separated by 3 or more years. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Mini-Mental State Examination is a useful screening instrument to assess level of cognitive function, it has limited value in measuring the progression of Alzheimer disease in individual patients for periods less than 3 years because of a large measurement error and substantial variation in change in annual score.
Authors: Eric M Blalock; James W Geddes; Kuey Chu Chen; Nada M Porter; William R Markesbery; Philip W Landfield Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-02-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: I Masse; R Bordet; D Deplanque; A Al Khedr; F Richard; C Libersa; F Pasquier Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: M E Soto; S Andrieu; C Arbus; M Ceccaldi; P Couratier; T Dantoine; J-F Dartigues; S Gillette-Guyonnet; F Nourhashemi; P-J Ousset; M Poncet; F Portet; J Touchon; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: David B Reuben; Zaldy S Tan; Tahmineh Romero; Neil S Wenger; Emmett Keeler; Lee A Jennings Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Michelle Shardell; Richard D Semba; Caterina Rosano; Rita R Kalyani; Stefania Bandinelli; Chee W Chia; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 6.053