Literature DB >> 18690832

Alzheimer's disease drug development in 2008 and beyond: problems and opportunities.

Robert E Becker1, Nigel H Greig.   

Abstract

Recently, a number of Alzheimer's disease (AD) multi-center clinical trials (CT) have failed to provide statistically significant evidence of drug efficacy. To test for possible design or execution flaws we analyzed in detail CTs for two failed drugs that were strongly supported by preclinical evidence and by proven CT AD efficacy for other drugs in their class. Studies of the failed commercial trials suggest that methodological flaws may contribute to the failures and that these flaws lurk within current drug development practices ready to impact other AD drug development [1]. To identify and counter risks we considered the relevance to AD drug development of the following factors: (1) effective dosing of the drug product, (2) reliable evaluations of research subjects, (3) effective implementation of quality controls over data at research sites, (4) resources for practitioners to effectively use CT results in patient care, (5) effective disease modeling, (6) effective research designs. New drugs currently under development for AD address a variety of specific mechanistic targets. Mechanistic targets provide AD drug development opportunities to escape from many of the factors that currently undermine AD clinical pharmacology, especially the problems of inaccuracy and imprecision associated with using rated outcomes. In this paper we conclude that many of the current problems encountered in AD drug development can be avoided by changing practices. Current problems with human errors in clinical trials make it difficult to differentiate drugs that fail to evidence efficacy from apparent failures due to Type II errors. This uncertainty and the lack of publication of negative data impede researchers' abilities to improve methodologies in clinical pharmacology and to develop a sound body of knowledge about drug actions. We consider the identification of molecular targets as offering further opportunities for overcoming current failures in drug development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18690832      PMCID: PMC2570097          DOI: 10.2174/156720508785132299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res        ISSN: 1567-2050            Impact factor:   3.498


  52 in total

1.  The experimental Alzheimer drug phenserine: preclinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  N H Greig; E De Micheli; H W Holloway; Q S Yu; T Utsuki; T A Perry; A Brossi; D K Ingram; J Deutsch; D K Lahiri; T T Soncrant
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand Suppl       Date:  2000

2.  Penny-wise and pound-foolish: the impact of measurement error on sample size requirements in clinical trials.

Authors:  D O Perkins; R J Wyatt; J J Bartko
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  A 24-week, randomized, double-blind study of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  H Feldman; S Gauthier; J Hecker; B Vellas; P Subbiah; E Whalen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Effects of interrater reliability of psychopathologic assessment on power and sample size calculations in clinical trials.

Authors:  Matthias J Müller; Armin Szegedi
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.153

5.  The problem of measurement error in multisite clinical trials.

Authors:  M A Demitrack; D Faries; J M Herrera; D DeBrota; W Z Potter
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1998

Review 6.  Pharmacodynamic-tolerability relationships of cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  B P Imbimbo
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Metrifonate: update on a new antidementia agent.

Authors:  J M Ringman; J L Cummings
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Severity of depression and response to antidepressants and placebo: an analysis of the Food and Drug Administration database.

Authors:  Arif Khan; Robyn M Leventhal; Shirin R Khan; Walter A Brown
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.153

9.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of metrifonate in patients with probable Alzheimer disease. The Metrifonate Study Group.

Authors:  J P Blass; P A Cyrus; F Bieber; B Gulanski
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 10.  Propentofylline for dementia.

Authors:  M Frampton; R J Harvey; V Kirchner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Drug development status for Alzheimer's disease: present scenario.

Authors:  Shubham Misra; Bikash Medhi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Increasing the success rate for Alzheimer's disease drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Robert E Becker; Nigel H Greig
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 6.098

Review 3.  Neurotheranostics as personalized medicines.

Authors:  Bhavesh D Kevadiya; Brendan M Ottemann; Midhun Ben Thomas; Insiya Mukadam; Saumya Nigam; JoEllyn McMillan; Santhi Gorantla; Tatiana K Bronich; Benson Edagwa; Howard E Gendelman
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Stratifying risk for dementia onset using large-scale electronic health record data: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas H McCoy; Larry Han; Amelia M Pellegrini; Rudolph E Tanzi; Sabina Berretta; Roy H Perlis
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  Neuroprotective effects of Hu-Yi-Neng, a diet supplement, on SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells.

Authors:  Y-H Yang; T-J Hsieh; M-L Tsai; C-H Chen; H-T Lin; S-J Wu
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 6.  Why do so many drugs for Alzheimer's disease fail in development? Time for new methods and new practices?

Authors:  Robert E Becker; Nigel H Greig; Ezio Giacobini
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.472

7.  Neuropsychiatric clinical trials: should they accommodate real-world practices or set standards for clinical practices?

Authors:  Robert E Becker; Nigel H Greig
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.153

Review 8.  Alzheimer's disease as homeostatic responses to age-related myelin breakdown.

Authors:  George Bartzokis
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  A 22-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of Crocus sativus in the treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Shahin Akhondzadeh; Mehdi Shafiee Sabet; Mohammad Hossein Harirchian; Mansoreh Togha; Hamed Cheraghmakani; Soodeh Razeghi; Seyyed Shamssedin Hejazi; Mohammad Hossein Yousefi; Roozbeh Alimardani; Amirhossein Jamshidi; Shams-Ali Rezazadeh; Aboulghasem Yousefi; Farhad Zare; Atbin Moradi; Ardalan Vossoughi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Advances in Alzheimer therapy: understanding pharmacological approaches to the disease.

Authors:  Ana Martínez; Debomoy K Lahiri; Ezio Giacobini; Nigel H Greig
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.