David B Reuben1, Zaldy S Tan1, Tahmineh Romero2, Neil S Wenger2, Emmett Keeler3, Lee A Jennings4. 1. Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California. 3. RAND Health, Santa Monica, California. 4. Reynolds Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Persons with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRDs) require comprehensive care that spans health systems and community-based organizations. This study examined the clinical outcomes of a comprehensive dementia care program and identified subgroups who were more likely to benefit. DESIGN: Observational, baseline and 1 year after intervention. SETTING: Urban, academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 554 persons with dementia and their caregivers who had 1-year follow-up evaluations and data on clinical outcomes. INTERVENTION: Health system-based comprehensive dementia care management program using nurse practitioner dementia care managers. MEASUREMENTS: Patient measures included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Functional Activities Questionnaire, Basic and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales, the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) Severity. Caregiver measures included the Modified Caregiver Strain Index, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, NPI-Q Distress, and the Dementia Burden Scale-Caregiver). We used established minimal clinically important differences and lowest tertiles of baseline symptoms to define improving symptoms and maintaining low symptoms as clinical benefit for patients and caregivers. RESULTS: At year 1, persons with ADRD improved on all scales, except MMSE and functional status measures; caregivers improved on all scales. Using validated instruments, 314/543 (58%) of patients, 282/447 (63%) of caregivers, and 376/501 (75%) of patients or caregivers demonstrated clinical benefit. In adjusted multivariate models, at year 1, more behavioral symptoms and fewer depression symptoms at baseline were associated with patient improvement; and fewer baseline depression symptoms were associated with maintaining low behavioral symptoms. Male caregiver sex, higher baseline caregiver burden, and caring for patients with fewer baseline depression symptoms were associated with caregiver improvement. Male caregiver sex and patients with fewer depression symptoms, fewer behavioral symptoms, and more functional impairment at baseline were associated with caregivers maintaining low burden at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Health system-based comprehensive dementia care management is a promising approach to improving clinical outcomes, with benefits for both patients and caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2267-2273, 2019.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES:Persons with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRDs) require comprehensive care that spans health systems and community-based organizations. This study examined the clinical outcomes of a comprehensive dementia care program and identified subgroups who were more likely to benefit. DESIGN: Observational, baseline and 1 year after intervention. SETTING: Urban, academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 554 persons with dementia and their caregivers who had 1-year follow-up evaluations and data on clinical outcomes. INTERVENTION: Health system-based comprehensive dementia care management program using nurse practitioner dementia care managers. MEASUREMENTS: Patient measures included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Functional Activities Questionnaire, Basic and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales, the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) Severity. Caregiver measures included the Modified Caregiver Strain Index, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, NPI-Q Distress, and the Dementia Burden Scale-Caregiver). We used established minimal clinically important differences and lowest tertiles of baseline symptoms to define improving symptoms and maintaining low symptoms as clinical benefit for patients and caregivers. RESULTS: At year 1, persons with ADRD improved on all scales, except MMSE and functional status measures; caregivers improved on all scales. Using validated instruments, 314/543 (58%) of patients, 282/447 (63%) of caregivers, and 376/501 (75%) of patients or caregivers demonstrated clinical benefit. In adjusted multivariate models, at year 1, more behavioral symptoms and fewer depression symptoms at baseline were associated with patient improvement; and fewer baseline depression symptoms were associated with maintaining low behavioral symptoms. Male caregiver sex, higher baseline caregiver burden, and caring for patients with fewer baseline depression symptoms were associated with caregiver improvement. Male caregiver sex and patients with fewer depression symptoms, fewer behavioral symptoms, and more functional impairment at baseline were associated with caregivers maintaining low burden at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Health system-based comprehensive dementia care management is a promising approach to improving clinical outcomes, with benefits for both patients and caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2267-2273, 2019.
Authors: Christopher M Callahan; Malaz A Boustani; Frederick W Unverzagt; Mary G Austrom; Teresa M Damush; Anthony J Perkins; Bridget A Fultz; Siu L Hui; Steven R Counsell; Hugh C Hendrie Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-05-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lee A Jennings; Alison M Laffan; Anna C Schlissel; Erin Colligan; Zaldy Tan; Neil S Wenger; David B Reuben Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: David B Reuben; Leslie C Evertson; Neil S Wenger; Katherine Serrano; Joshua Chodosh; Linda Ercoli; Zaldy S Tan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: David B Reuben; Thomas M Gill; Alan Stevens; Jeff Williamson; Elena Volpi; Maya Lichtenstein; Lee A Jennings; Zaldy Tan; Leslie Evertson; David Bass; Lisa Weitzman; Martie Carnie; Nancy Wilson; Katy Araujo; Peter Charpentier; Can Meng; Erich J Greene; James Dziura; Jodi Liu; Erin Unger; Mia Yang; Katherine Currie; Kristin M Lenoir; Aval-NaʼRee S Green; Sitara Abraham; Ashley Vernon; Rafael Samper-Ternent; Mukaila Raji; Roxana M Hirst; Rebecca Galloway; Glen R Finney; Ilene Ladd; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Pamela Borek; Peter Peduzzi Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Nicole D Boyd; Georges Naasan; Krista L Harrison; Sarah B Garrett; Talita D'Aguiar Rosa; Brenda Pérez-Cerpa; Shamiel McFarlane; Bruce L Miller; Christine S Ritchie Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2021-10-06 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: David B Reuben; Leslie Chang Evertson; Rebecca Jackson-Stoeckle; Gary Epstein-Lubow; Lynn Hill Spragens; Kristin Lees Haggerty; Katherine Sy Serrano; Lee A Jennings Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Leslie Chang Evertson; Lee A Jennings; David B Reuben; Kassandra E Zaila; Nadia Akram; Tahmineh Romero; Zaldy S Tan Journal: Geriatr Nurs Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 2.361
Authors: Huong Q Nguyen; Soo Borson; Peter Khang; Annette Langer-Gould; Susan E Wang; Jarrod Carrol; Janet S Lee Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Date: 2022-03-13