Literature DB >> 10400149

Control of low-level radiation exposure: time for a change?

R Clarke1.   

Abstract

The carcinogenic risks of exposure to low-level ionising radiation used by the ICRP have been challenged as being, at the same time, both too high and too low. This paper explains that the epidemiological evidence will always be limited at low doses, so that understanding the cellular mechanisms of carcinogenesis is increasingly important to assess the biological risks. An analysis is then given of the reasons why the challenges to the ICRP, especially about the linear non-threshold response model, have arisen. As a result of considering the issues, the Main Commission of the ICRP is now proposing a revised, simpler, approach based on the concept of what is being called 'controllable dose'. This is an individual-based philosophy and represents a shift in emphasis by the Commission from societal-oriented criteria using Collective Dose. Finally the paper speculates on the consequences for radiological protection of such a change in policy. The Commission wishes its ideas to be discussed as part of its reconsideration of its recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10400149     DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/19/2/301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  5 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Radiobiology and gray science: flaws in landmark new radiation protections.

Authors:  Kristin Shrader-Frechette
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The new radiobiology: returning to our roots.

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Observations on the Chernobyl Disaster and LNT.

Authors:  Zbigniew Jaworowski
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Restructuring nuclear regulations.

Authors:  Kenneth L Mossman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.