Literature DB >> 12515683

Restructuring nuclear regulations.

Kenneth L Mossman1.   

Abstract

Nuclear regulations are a subset of social regulations (laws to control activities that may negatively impact the environment, health, and safety) that concern control of ionizing radiation from radiation-producing equipment and from radioactive materials. The impressive safety record among nuclear technologies is due, in no small part, to the work of radiation safety professionals and to a protection system that has kept pace with the rapid technologic advancements in electric power generation, engineering, and medicine. The price of success, however, has led to a regulatory organization and philosophy characterized by complexity, confusion, public fear, and increasing economic costs. Over the past 20 years, regulatory costs in the nuclear sector have increased more than 250% in constant 1995 U.S. dollars. Costs of regulatory compliance can be reduced sharply, particularly when health and environmental benefits of risk reduction are questionable. Three key regulatory areas should be closely examined and modified to improve regulatory effectiveness and efficiency: a) radiation protection should be changed from a risk-based to dose-based system; b) the U.S. government should adopt the modern metric system (International System of Units), and radiation quantities and units should be simplified to facilitate international communication and public understanding; and c) a single, independent office is needed to coordinate nuclear regulations established by U.S. federal agencies and departments.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12515683      PMCID: PMC1241300          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.5650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  7 in total

1.  Control of low-level radiation exposure: time for a change?

Authors:  R Clarke
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.394

2.  On being understood: clarity and jargon in radiation protection.

Authors:  Daniel J Strom; Charles R Watson
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  The linear no-threshold debate: where do we go from here?

Authors:  K L Mossman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The victims of chernobyl in Greece: induced abortions after the accident.

Authors:  D Trichopoulos; X Zavitsanos; C Koutis; P Drogari; C Proukakis; E Petridou
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-10-31

5.  Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  T O Tengs; M E Adams; J S Pliskin; D G Safran; J E Siegel; M C Weinstein; J D Graham
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  An approach to setting radiation standards.

Authors:  H I Adler; A M Weinberg
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Very high background radiation areas of Ramsar, Iran: preliminary biological studies.

Authors:  M Ghiassi-nejad; S M J Mortazavi; J R Cameron; A Niroomand-rad; P A Karam
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.316

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Magnetite-based adsorbents for sequestration of radionuclides: a review.

Authors:  Syed M Husnain; Wooyong Um; Yoon-Seok Chang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.036

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.