Literature DB >> 31489699

Two-sample test for correlated data under outcome-dependent sampling with an application to self-reported weight loss data.

Yi Cai1, Jing Huang2, Jing Ning3, Mei-Ling Ting Lee4, Bernard Rosner5,6, Yong Chen2.   

Abstract

Standard methods for two-sample tests such as the t-test and Wilcoxon rank sum test may lead to incorrect type I errors when applied to longitudinal or clustered data. Recent alternatives of two-sample tests for clustered data often require certain assumptions on the correlation structure and/or noninformative cluster size. In this paper, based on a novel pseudolikelihood for correlated data, we propose a score test without knowledge of the correlation structure or assuming data missingness at random. The proposed score test can capture differences in the mean and variance between two groups simultaneously. We use projection theory to derive the limiting distribution of the test statistic, in which the covariance matrix can be empirically estimated. We conduct simulation studies to evaluate the proposed test and compare it with existing methods. To illustrate the usefulness proposed test, we use it to compare self-reported weight loss data in a friends' referral group, with the data from the Internet self-joining group.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  U-statistics; correlated data; outcome-dependent sampling; pseudolikelihood; two-sample test

Year:  2019        PMID: 31489699      PMCID: PMC6800790          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  Use of the Mann-Whitney U-test for clustered data.

Authors:  B Rosner; D Grove
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Long-term maintenance of weight loss: current status.

Authors:  R W Jeffery; A Drewnowski; L H Epstein; A J Stunkard; G T Wilson; R R Wing; D R Hill
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Method to detect differentially methylated loci with case-control designs using Illumina arrays.

Authors:  Shuang Wang
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 4.  Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review.

Authors:  Natalie McGauran; Beate Wieseler; Julia Kreis; Yvonne-Beatrice Schüler; Heike Kölsch; Thomas Kaiser
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Comparison of alternative regression models for paired binary data.

Authors:  R J Glynn; B Rosner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Benefits of recruiting participants with friends and increasing social support for weight loss and maintenance.

Authors:  R R Wing; R W Jeffery
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-02

7.  Weight variability and mortality: the Iowa Women's Health Study.

Authors:  A R Folsom; S A French; W Zheng; J E Baxter; R W Jeffery
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1996-08

8.  Weight change, body composition, and risk of mobility disability and mortality in older adults: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Rachel A Murphy; Kushang V Patel; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Denise K Houston; Anne B Newman; Annemarie Koster; Eleanor M Simonsick; Frances A Tylvasky; Peggy M Cawthon; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years.

Authors:  Nicholas A Christakis; James H Fowler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Incorporation of clustering effects for the Wilcoxon rank sum test: a large-sample approach.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Robert J Glynn; Mei-Ling Ting Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.