Literature DB >> 10399198

Adaptive design improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.

J M Heyd1, B P Carlin.   

Abstract

The continual reassessment method (CRM) enables full and efficient use of all data and prior information available in a phase I study. However, despite a number of recent enhancements to the method, its acceptance in actual clinical practice has been hampered by several practical difficulties. In this paper, we consider several further refinements in the context of phase I oncology trials. In particular, we allow the trial to stop when the width of the posterior 95 per cent probability interval for the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) becomes sufficiently narrow (that is, when the information accumulating from the trial data reaches a prespecified level). We employ a simulation study to evaluate five such stopping rules under three alternative states of prior knowledge regarding the MTD (accurate, too low and too high). Our results suggest our adaptive designs preserve the CRM's estimation ability while offering the possibility of earlier stopping of the trial.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10399198     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990615)18:11<1307::aid-sim128>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  22 in total

Review 1.  Statistics in clinical trials.

Authors:  Stephanie J Green; Donna K Pauler
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Evaluation of agile designs in first-in-human (FIH) trials--a simulation study.

Authors:  Itay Perlstein; James A Bolognese; Rajesh Krishna; John A Wagner
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  A simulation-based comparison of the traditional method, Rolling-6 design and a frequentist version of the continual reassessment method with special attention to trial duration in pediatric Phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Arzu Onar-Thomas; Zang Xiong
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Robust EM Continual Reassessment Method in Oncology Dose Finding.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.

Authors:  Emily M Van Meter; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Early-Phase Platform Trials: A New Paradigm for Dose Finding and Treatment Screening in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Mei-Yin C Polley; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

7.  Adaptive Optimal Designs for Dose-Finding Studies with Time-to-Event Outcomes.

Authors:  Yevgen Ryeznik; Oleksandr Sverdlov; Andrew C Hooker
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Bayesian hybrid dose-finding design in phase I oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Bayesian Dose Finding for Combined Drugs with Discrete and Continuous Doses.

Authors:  Lin Huo; Ying Yuan; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.728

10.  Continual reassessment method vs. traditional empirically based design: modifications motivated by Phase I trials in pediatric oncology by the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium.

Authors:  Arzu Onar; Mehmet Kocak; James M Boyett
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.