Literature DB >> 10398557

In vitro development of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms using slime-producing variants and ATP-bioluminescence for automated bacterial quantification.

E Gracia1, A Fernández, P Conchello, J L Alabart, M Pérez, B Amorena.   

Abstract

In this work, a method was developed to establish Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on 96-well plates and automatically quantify viable cells within these biofilms by ATP-bioluminescence. Different strains were compared for biofilm formation. Cells from slime producing (SP) strain variants were more adherent (p < 0.001) and therefore more suitable for biofilm formation than non-slime producing original isolates. To compare biofilm support surfaces, SP biofilms were formed for 6, 24 and 48 h on 96-well polystyrene plates, containing wells coated with gelatin, poly-L-lysine or pre-treated for tissue culture and uncoated wells. Tissue culture-treated wells enhanced biofilm formation, allowing the highest growth (p < 0.001) in well-established biofilms (24 or 48 h old). For ATP quantification, the efficacy of different ATP extractants was compared: dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), a commercially available releasing reagent(R) (RR) and lysostaphin. A greater inhibitory effect on the ATP detection (p < 0.01), a more variable light emission (variation coefficient >/=50% vs. <19%, respectively) and a lower extraction efficiency (p < 0.05) were found in the case of TCA or lysostaphin in relation to RR or DMSO. DMSO was found preferable in relation to RR (upper detection limits 2.3 x 10(9) and 2 x 10(8) CFU/mL respectively) for bacterial ATP extraction from biofilms with high bacterial density. DMSO extracted ATP within seconds, light emission being stable for 6 h. The method developed allows automated viability determination of biofilm cells using bioluminescence and simultaneous study of factors affecting this viability (culture media, antibiotic types, antimicrobial concentrations, support surfaces and biofilm ages). It may be of use in bacteriological and antimicrobial research. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10398557     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7243(199901/02)14:1<23::AID-BIO513>3.0.CO;2-M

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Luminescence        ISSN: 1522-7235            Impact factor:   2.464


  11 in total

1.  Dynamical determinants of drug-inducible gene expression in a single bacterium.

Authors:  Thuc T Le; Thierry Emonet; Sebastien Harlepp; Calin C Guet; Philippe Cluzel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Antibacterial properties and mode of action of a short acyl-lysyl oligomer.

Authors:  Fadia Zaknoon; Hadar Sarig; Shahar Rotem; Liran Livne; Andrey Ivankin; David Gidalevitz; Amram Mor
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Quantitative Examination of Antibiotic Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Aggregates Using ATP-utilization Commercial Assays and Live/Dead Staining.

Authors:  Liang-Chun Wang; Jacob Wagner; Annabelle Capino; Elizabeth Nesbit; Wenxia Song; Daniel C Stein
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans biofilms.

Authors:  G Ramage; K Vande Walle; B L Wickes; J L López-Ribot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Development of a standard test to assess the resistance of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm cells to disinfectants.

Authors:  Suzanne B I Luppens; Martine W Reij; Rob W L van der Heijden; Frank M Rombouts; Tjakko Abee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Tricarboxylic acid cycle-dependent regulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis.

Authors:  Marat R Sadykov; Michael E Olson; Steven Halouska; Yefei Zhu; Paul D Fey; Robert Powers; Greg A Somerville
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Rapid direct method for monitoring antibiotics in a mouse model of bacterial biofilm infection.

Authors:  Jagath L Kadurugamuwa; Lin V Sin; Jun Yu; Kevin P Francis; Richard Kimura; Tony Purchio; Pamela R Contag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Direct continuous method for monitoring biofilm infection in a mouse model.

Authors:  Jagath L Kadurugamuwa; Lin Sin; Eddie Albert; Jun Yu; Kevin Francis; Monica DeBoer; Michael Rubin; Carole Bellinger-Kawahara; T R Parr; Pamela R Contag
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  In vitro activities of different inhibitors of bacterial transcription against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm.

Authors:  Philippe Villain-Guillot; Maxime Gualtieri; Lionel Bastide; Jean-Paul Leonetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Rapid in Vitro Quantification of S. aureus Biofilms on Vascular Graft Surfaces.

Authors:  Monika Herten; Theodosios Bisdas; Dennis Knaack; Karsten Becker; Nani Osada; Giovanni B Torsello; Evgeny A Idelevich
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.