| Literature DB >> 29259580 |
Monika Herten1, Theodosios Bisdas2, Dennis Knaack3, Karsten Becker3, Nani Osada1, Giovanni B Torsello1,2, Evgeny A Idelevich3.
Abstract
Objectives: Increasing resistance of microorganisms and particularly tolerance of bacterial biofilms against antibiotics require the need for alternative antimicrobial substances. S. aureus is the most frequent pathogen causing vascular graft infections. In order to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy, quantification of the bacterial biofilms is necessary. Aim of the present study was the validation of an in vitro model for quantification of bacterial biofilm on vascular graft surfaces using three different assays.Entities:
Keywords: ATP assay; antimicrobial activity; biofilm quantification; colony-forming units (CFU); crystal violet staining (Cry); vascular graft
Year: 2017 PMID: 29259580 PMCID: PMC5723318 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Experiment set-up: (A) Vascular graft material was dissected with biopsy punches resulting in a standardized surface area of 0.25 cm2 and (B) placed into 96-well polystyrene (PS) cell culture plates.
Figure 2SEM analysis of vascular graft material: upper row: on Dacron fiber, lower row: on PTFE surface: (A) knitted structure; (B) fibers; (C) S. aureus strain SH1000 biofilm on Dacron fiber. (D,E) PTFE surface in different magnifications; (F) S. aureus strain SH1000 on PTFE.
Figure 3Biofilm quantification on the control surface polystyrene. (A) Mitochondrial ATP concentration, (B) CFU count, (C) Crystal violet staining.
Figure 4Quantification of the S. aureus strains on different surfaces: polystyrene, Dacron and PTFE. Upper: ATP concentration. Lower: CFU counts. Data for the polystyrene surface were additionally depicted in Figure 3.
Pearson's correlation coefficient of the S. aureus strains on the different materials (Dacron or polystyrene) for ATP vs. CFU, ATP vs. Cry, and CFU vs. Cry.
| ATP vs. CFU | Dacron | 4 h | Strong | BEB-029 |
| Moderate strong | BEB-295 | |||
| 18 h | Very weak | All three strains | ||
| ATP vs. CFU | PTFE | 4 h | Negative correlations | All three strains |
| 18 h | Negative correlations | All three strains | ||
| ATP vs. CFU | PS | 4 h | Very strong | BEB-029 |
| 18 h | Moderate strong | SH1000 | ||
| ATP vs. Cry | PS | 4 h | Strong | BEB-295 |
| Moderate strong | BEB-029 | |||
| 18 h | Very strong | BEB-029 | ||
| Strong | BEB-295, SH1000 | |||
| Cry vs. CFU | PS | 4 h | Strong | BEB-029 |
| Weak | BEB-295 | |||
| 18 h | Weak | BEB-029, SH1000 |
The following interpretation of the correlation coefficient and the strength of relationship was applied: 0.01–0.2: very weak, 0.21–0.4 weak, 0.41–0.6 moderately strong, 0.61–0.8 strong, 0.81–1 very strong. There were no significant positive correlations between the results of the ATP vs. CFU assay on PTFE surfaces. Listed are the highest positive correlations for the time point and material used. A detailed list of all Pearson's correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination of quantification is given in the supplementary material (Table .