Literature DB >> 10395394

Effect of the urine conditioning film on ureteral stent encrustation and characterization of its protein composition.

M Santin1, A Motta, S P Denyer, M Cannas.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to characterize the protein composition of the conditioning film deposited onto the surface of ureteral stents during in vivo implantation and to relate its presence to the precipitation of calcium crystals. The protein pattern of the conditioning film of implanted nonencrusted and encrusted urological stents was assessed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot of the desorbed species. The results obtained highlighted different electrophoresis profiles between nonencrusted and encrusted stents. Western blot showed the ubiquitous presence of albumin, while Tamm-Horsfall Protein and alpha1-microglobulin adsorption was limited to nonencrusted devices. By an in vitro dynamic model in which artificial urine was flowed through the lumen of control and retrieved nonencrusted stents, we demonstrated that the organic layer remarkably enhanced crystal precipitation and aggregation events on the surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10395394     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00026-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  13 in total

1.  Electrical microcurrent to prevent conditioning film and bacterial adhesion to urological stents.

Authors:  Michael Gabi; Lukas Hefermehl; Danijela Lukic; Raphael Zahn; Janos Vörös; Daniel Eberli
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-08-05

Review 2.  Current status of ureteral stent technologies: comfort and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Carlos E Mendez-Probst; Alfonso Fernandez; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Coating of polyurethane scaffolds with collagen: comparison of coating and cross-linking techniques.

Authors:  Timothy Douglas; Håvard J Haugen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Blocking of bacterial biofilm formation by a fish protein coating.

Authors:  Rebecca Munk Vejborg; Per Klemm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Treatment of forgotten ureteral stents: how much does it really cost? A cost-effectiveness study in 27 patients.

Authors:  Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Haluk Söylemez; Yasar Bozkurt; Necmettin Penbegül; Murat Atar
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-08-11

6.  Experience of retaining encrusted ureteral stents: URL by 4.5/6.5F ureteroscope can reduce the possibility of PCNL.

Authors:  Zhaohui He; Hanqi Lei; Caixia Zhang; Hangtao Wang; Fucai Tang; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Improved detection of microbial ureteral stent colonisation by sonication.

Authors:  Gernot Bonkat; Malte Rieken; Cyrill A Rentsch; Stephen Wyler; Antje Feike; Juliane Schäfer; Thomas Gasser; Andrej Trampuz; Alexander Bachmann; Andreas F Widmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Effect of uropathogens on in vitro encrustation of polyurethane double J ureteral stents.

Authors:  Nandakumar Venkatesan; Sunil Shroff; Karthik Jeyachandran; Mukesh Doble
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-06-02

9.  Enterococcal biofilm formation and virulence in an optimized murine model of foreign body-associated urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Pascale S Guiton; Chia S Hung; Lynn E Hancock; Michael G Caparon; Scott J Hultgren
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Presence of five conditioning film proteins are highly associated with early stent encrustation.

Authors:  Benjamin K Canales; LeeAnn Higgins; Todd Markowski; Lorraine Anderson; Qin A Li; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.