Literature DB >> 10394212

Validity of the computer-assisted cephalometric growth prognosis VTO (Visual Treatment Objective) according to Ricketts.

C Toepel-Sievers1, H Fischer-Brandies.   

Abstract

The computer-assisted growth prognosis "Visual Treatment Objective" (VTO) according to Ricketts gives an individual prediction based on empirically obtained mean growth rates and includes the expected influence of orthodontic treatment. The objective of the present study was to investigate the validity of the VTO over a period of 2 and 5 years. For this purpose, lateral teleradiographic images of 180 patients were analyzed before the start and after the completion of active treatment, and the actual outcome was compared with the prognosis. For both prognostic periods, the VTO yielded a satisfactory prognosis of maxillary inclination, of the anteroposterior position of the maxilla, of growth in mandibular length, of the anteroposterior position and rotation of the mandible, of the positional relation of the mandible and maxilla, of basicranial configuration, and of vertical craniofacial development. For neither of the 2 prognostic periods did the VTO give a satisfactory prognosis of dental relations, of dentoskeletal relations or of soft-tissue configuration. The VTO is capable of giving a largely valid prognosis of skeletal growth tendencies. However, in view of the large number of parameters affected by therapeutic measures, the VTO prognosis must be expected to differ from the actual treatment outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10394212     DOI: 10.1007/bf01365265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  9 in total

1.  [Predictability using the "Dentofacial Planner Version 4.22 A" of soft tissue changes following adult orthodontic treatment].

Authors:  H Fischer-Brandies; H Seeholzer; E Fischer-Brandies; I Bauerfeind
Journal:  Inf Orthod Kieferorthop       Date:  1990

2.  Cephalometric errors: a comparison between repeat measurements and retaken radiographs.

Authors:  M S Cooke; S H Wei
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.291

3.  A simplified approach to prediction.

Authors:  L E Johnston
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1975-03

4.  Parental data used to predict growth of craniofacial form.

Authors:  A Suzuki; Y Takahama
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 5.  An overview of computerized cephalometrics.

Authors:  R M Ricketts; R W Bench; J J Hilgers; R Schulhof
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1972-01

6.  The accuracy of computerized growth prediction in Class II high-angle cases.

Authors:  T L Thames; P M Sinclair; R G Alexander
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-05

7.  The use of genetic data in the prediction of craniofacial dimensions.

Authors:  N Nakata; P I Yu; B Davis; W E Nance
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1973-05

8.  A statistical evaluation of cephalometric prediction.

Authors:  L E Johnston
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Role of parental variables in predicting facial growth after treatment of anterior crossbite.

Authors:  A Nakasima; M Ichinose
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.650

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Cephalometric changes in growing patients with increased vertical dimension treated with cervical headgear.

Authors:  Sergio Sambataro; Rosamaria Fastuca; Nelson J Oppermann; Paola Lorusso; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; Alberto Caprioglio
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 1.938

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.