Literature DB >> 1054908

A simplified approach to prediction.

L E Johnston.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1975        PMID： 1054908     DOI： 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90048-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN： 0002-9416


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Validity of the computer-assisted cephalometric growth prognosis VTO (Visual Treatment Objective) according to Ricketts.

Authors:  C Toepel-Sievers; H Fischer-Brandies
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Evaluation of the predictive impact of cephalometric variables. Logistic regression and ROC curves.

Authors:  C J Lux; C Conradt; A Stellzig; G Komposch
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  An interview with Mark G. Hans.

Authors:  Mark G Hans; Matilde da Cunha Gonçalves Nojima
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

4.  Retrospective 25-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in Angle Class III patients : Success versus failure.

Authors:  Brigitte Wendl; A Kamenica; H Droschl; N Jakse; F Weiland; T Wendl; M Wendl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Craniofacial growth predictors for class II and III malocclusions: A systematic review.

Authors:  Antonio Jiménez-Silva; Romano Carnevali-Arellano; Sheilah Vivanco-Coke; Julio Tobar-Reyes; Pamela Araya-Díaz; Hernán Palomino-Montenegro
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-12-04

6.  Differences in the heritability of craniofacial skeletal and dental characteristics between twin pairs with skeletal Class I and II malocclusions.

Authors:  Heon-Mook Park; Pil-Jong Kim; Joohon Sung; Yun-Mi Song; Hong-Gee Kim; Young Ho Kim; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 1.372
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.