Literature DB >> 1990820

Parental data used to predict growth of craniofacial form.

A Suzuki1, Y Takahama.   

Abstract

The sample for this study consisted of 250 families. From 850 lateral and posteroanterior cephalograms, 81 variables from the X, Y coordinates of 67 landmarks were calculated and matched with the normal distribution. Principal component analysis was used to summarize these 81 variables in proper factor scores. The craniofacial patterns of 500 adults were classified by cluster analysis on the basis of those factor scores. This study introduced the concept of "similar parent" and "dissimilar parent" instead of the father and mother equally. Finally, the following model for predicting the individual growth of craniofacial characters was obtained. The predicted value Y(t) [formula: see text] is the logistic curve used in growth studies, C1X(s) is for the similar parent of a child, and C2X(d) is for the dissimilar parent. Multiple regression functions were calculated for both sexes in each of four craniofacial patterns. The errors of prediction at the average age of 18 years from the data at the average age of 11.6 years were 1.12, 2.88, 2.87, 3.14, and 1.93 mm for the respective distances S-N, N-Me, S-Me, Gn-Cd, and G-G'. These errors in our growth prediction are much smaller than in ordinary normal facial diagrams and may be considered negligible for orthodontic clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1990820     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70113-B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  4 in total

1.  Validity of the computer-assisted cephalometric growth prognosis VTO (Visual Treatment Objective) according to Ricketts.

Authors:  C Toepel-Sievers; H Fischer-Brandies
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Evaluation of the predictive impact of cephalometric variables. Logistic regression and ROC curves.

Authors:  C J Lux; C Conradt; A Stellzig; G Komposch
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  The comparison of facial estethics between orthodontically treated patients and their parents.

Authors:  Sertac Aksakalli; Abdullah Demir
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-03

Review 4.  Evaluation of Parental Nasomaxillary Asymmetry as a Risk Factor for Development of Palatal Clefts in their Offsprings.

Authors:  Dinesh Kumar S; K Gopalkrishnan; C Bhasker Rao; Sanjay V Ganeshkar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2010-09-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.