Literature DB >> 10391620

Attention to facial regions in segmental and prosodic visual speech perception tasks.

C R Lansing1, G W McConkie.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that visual information related to segmental versus prosodic aspects of speech is distributed differently on the face of the talker. In the first experiment, eye gaze was monitored for 12 observers with normal hearing. Participants made decisions about segmental and prosodic categories for utterances presented without sound. The first experiment found that observers spend more time looking at and direct more gazes toward the upper part of the talker's face in making decisions about intonation patterns than about the words being spoken. The second experiment tested the Gaze Direction Assumption underlying Experiment 1--that is, that people direct their gaze to the stimulus region containing information required for their task. In this experiment, 18 observers with normal hearing made decisions about segmental and prosodic categories under conditions in which face motion was restricted to selected areas of the face. The results indicate that information in the upper part of the talker's face is more critical for intonation pattern decisions than for decisions about word segments or primary sentence stress, thus supporting the Gaze Direction Assumption. Visual speech perception proficiency requires learning where to direct visual attention for cues related to different aspects of speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10391620     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4203.526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  26 in total

1.  The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.

Authors:  Demet Gurler; Nathan Doyle; Edgar Walker; John Magnotti; Michael Beauchamp
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The role of early visual attention in social development.

Authors:  Jennifer B Wagner; Rhiannon J Luyster; Jung Yeon Yim; Helen Tager-Flusberg; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2013-03-01

4.  Spatial Frequency Requirements and Gaze Strategy in Visual-Only and Audiovisual Speech Perception.

Authors:  Amanda H Wilson; Agnès Alsius; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The role of limited salience of speech in selective attention to faces in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Frederick Shic; Quan Wang; Suzanne L Macari; Katarzyna Chawarska
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 8.982

6.  Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Nicholas A Smith; Jody L Spalding; Daniel L Valente
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  What do infants see in faces? ERP evidence of different roles of eyes and mouth for face perception in 9-month-old infants.

Authors:  Alexandra P F Key; Wendy Stone; Susan M Williams
Journal:  Infant Child Dev       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

8.  Same but different: 9-month-old infants at average and high risk for autism look at the same facial features but process them using different brain mechanisms.

Authors:  Alexandra P F Key; Wendy L Stone
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.216

9.  Gaze response to dyadic bids at 2 years related to outcomes at 3 years in autism spectrum disorders: a subtyping analysis.

Authors:  Daniel J Campbell; Frederick Shic; Suzanne Macari; Katarzyna Chawarska
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-02

10.  Language familiarity modulates relative attention to the eyes and mouth of a talker.

Authors:  Elan Barenholtz; Lauren Mavica; David J Lewkowicz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.