Literature DB >> 10389723

Entry force and intra-abdominal pressure associated with six laparoscopic trocar-cannula systems: a randomized comparison.

C M Tarnay1, K B Glass, M G Munro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In trocar-cannula systems, increased entry force could result in loss of operator control, a potential cause of serious visceral and vascular injuries. We developed a system to measure entry force and intraperitoneal pressure to evaluate and compare trocar-cannula systems.
METHODS: Six laparoscopic trocar-cannula systems of similar diameter (12 mm) were tested (two pyramidal, two cutting-dilating, and two blunt conical) using a white swine model. All six systems were inserted into each of 12 subjects with location designated by random allotment (72 insertions). During each insertion, intraperitoneal pressure and entry force were measured using a system consisting of a gas-gas transducer, a 50-lb load cell, and a multichannel data acquisition board. Mean entry force and intraperitoneal pressure were compared using mixed-model analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Mean entry force measurements were as follows: pyramidal 9.01 lb and 13.48 lb, cutting-dilating 9.94 lb and 16.46 lb, and blunt conical 19.15 lb and 31.91 lb. Intraperitoneal pressure changes generally reflected measured entry force.
CONCLUSION: The system successfully measured both entry force and resultant intraperitoneal pressure. Pyramidal trocar-cannula systems required the lowest force for entry. These differences in entry force have potential clinical implications related to the risk of visceral and vascular injury. Intraperitoneal pressure measurement could be used as a surrogate for insertional force measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10389723     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00288-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Functional luminal imaging probe geometric and histomorphologic analysis of abdominal wall wound induced by different trocars in pigs.

Authors:  Jingbo Zhao; Donghua Liao; Barry P McMahon; Deidre O'Donovan; Rich Schiretz; Russell Heninrich; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A multicentric prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of Kii® Fios® First Entry Trocar in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Marcelo Loureiro; Mohamad Ramadan; El Mehdi Skalli; Pierre Blanc; Jean Michel Fabre; David Nocca
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Radially expanding laparoscopic trocar ports significantly reduce postoperative pain in all age groups.

Authors:  Simon C Mordecai; Oliver W N Warren; Stephen J Warren
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Blunt versus bladed trocars in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Oliver O Koch; Rudolph Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic entry techniques.

Authors:  Gaity Ahmad; Jade Baker; John Finnerty; Kevin Phillips; Andrew Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

6.  Port-site incisional hernia - A case series of 54 patients.

Authors:  A Lambertz; B O Stüben; B Bock; R Eickhoff; A Kroh; C D Klink; U P Neumann; C J Krones
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-06

7.  Laparoscopic Insertion of Various Shaped Trocars in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Danilo Galante Moreno; Cesar Augusto Martins Pereira; Ricardo Kyoiti Sant Anna; Rafael Ulysses de Azevedo; Luiz Felipe Savio; Ricardo Jordão Duarte; Miguel Srougi; Carlo Camargo Passerotti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.