Differential satiating effects of fats in the small intestine of obesity-resistant and obesity-prone rats.

The effects of duodenal infusions of fats on sham feeding was measured in two strains of rats that differ in their susceptibility to fat-induced obesity. Osborne-Mendel rats are prone to developing obesity on a high-fat diet and preferentially choose fats over carbohydrates in macronutrient selection paradigms. In contrast, S 5B/PL rats are resistant to developing obesity when eating a high-fat diet, and preferentially choose carbohydrates in macronutrient selection paradigms. To test the hypothesis that differences in the satiating potency of fats in the small intestine contributed to these differences between the two strains, we measured the effects of duodenal infusions of Intralipid and sodium linoleate on sham-feeding intakes. The results were consistent with the hypothesis. Duodenal infusions of either of these fats decreased intake significantly more in S5B/PL rats than in Osborne-Mendel rats. Both rat strains sham fed similar amounts when intestinally infused with 0.15 M NaCl. These results suggest that differences in responses to intestinal satiating mechanisms may contribute to the differences in susceptibility to fat-induced obesity in these rat strains.