Literature DB >> 10386655

A quality assurance phantom for three-dimensional radiation treatment planning.

T Craig1, D Brochu, J Van Dyk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Three-dimensional (3D) radiation treatment planning is facilitated through the use of computerized radiation treatment planning systems (RTPSs) and CT simulators (CT-sims). Quality assurance (QA) of these systems is necessary for ensuring that they fulfill their potential. However, comprehensive tools for the systematic QA of these systems have not been developed. We present a phantom that facilitates the evaluation of a large number of nondosimetric functions. These include CT image acquisition and transfer, graphical displays of 3D radiation beams, multiplanar CT image reconstructions, digitally reconstructed radiographs, the representation and manipulation of contoured patient anatomy, dose volume histograms, and the conversion of CT numbers to relative electron densities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A phantom was constructed which contains materials and geometries that are appropriate for the routine QA of the features described above. The anatomy of the phantom is used as a standard against which the performance of the 3D-RTPS or CT-sim is evaluated. The phantom was used to evaluate three different 3D-RTPSs and a CT-sim at four institutions.
RESULTS: Using this phantom, clinically significant errors and limitations in commercially available 3D treatment planning software were discovered. No errors were discovered in the beam display or image reconstructions in the systems examined. Problems were found in the anatomy display, automatic tools, and the CT number to relative electron density conversion data used in some of the systems.
CONCLUSION: This phantom is a unique tool designed explicitly for the QA of 3D treatment planning software. Errors and limitations discovered through its use indicate that the QA of commercial treatment planning software is necessary, and that this phantom is an effective device for this task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10386655     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00070-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  An analysis of an implantable dosimeter system for external beam therapy.

Authors:  Robert D Black; Charles W Scarantino; Gregory G Mann; Mitchell S Anscher; Robert D Ornitz; Benjamin E Nelms
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Can CT scan protocols used for radiotherapy treatment planning be adjusted to optimize image quality and patient dose? A systematic review.

Authors:  Anne T Davis; Antony L Palmer; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Evaluation of the deformation and corresponding dosimetric implications in prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Ning Wen; Carri Glide-Hurst; Teamour Nurushev; Lei Xing; Jinkoo Kim; Hualiang Zhong; Dezhi Liu; Manju Liu; Jay Burmeister; Benjamin Movsas; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A simple method to test the geometrical reliability of digital reconstructed radiograph (DRR).

Authors:  Stefania Pallotta; Marta Bucciolini
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  A framework for deformable image registration validation in radiotherapy clinical applications.

Authors:  Raj Varadhan; Grigorios Karangelis; Karthik Krishnan; Susanta Hui
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  A measure to evaluate deformable registration fields in clinical settings.

Authors:  Eduard Schreibmann; Paul Pantalone; Anthony Waller; Tim Fox
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.