Literature DB >> 10386409

Resection of subaortic stenosis; can a more aggressive approach be justified?

A J Parry1, J P Kovalchin, K Suda, D B McElhinney, J Wudel, N H Silverman, V M Reddy, F L Hanley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Discrete subaortic stenosis causes left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction and often produces aortic regurgitation (AR) which alone may precipitate surgical intervention. Conventional resection relieves the obstruction, but the recurrence rate is high, and the AR is little changed as the thick fibrous membrane which extends onto the valve leaflets remains. We studied whether an aggressive surgical approach could reduce both the severity of AR and rate of recurrence of obstruction associated with discrete subaortic stenosis, and whether this aggressive approach could be justified.
METHODS: Between June 1992 and April 1996, 37 patients aged 0.5-35 years (median 7.5) underwent resection of a discrete subaortic membrane. Ten underwent re-operation for recurrent obstruction and eight followed previous ventricular septal defect closure. LVOT gradient was measured using the modified Bernoulli equation and AR was graded on a scale of 0-4 (0 = none, 4 = severe). Postoperative assessment was performed early (<7 days) and at mid-term (27.0 months; range 2-59 months).
RESULTS: There was significant improvement in AR from mild/moderate to none/trivial (P = 0.019) immediately postoperatively and LVOT gradient from 66.9+/-30.4 to 15.1+/-12.2 mmHg (P < 0.0001). By stepwise logistic regression preoperative gradient correlated significantly with postoperative mild/moderate AR (P = 0.015) and LVOT gradient (P = 0.0036). Preoperative mild/moderate AR also correlated with postoperative mild/moderate AR (P = 0.034). Five patients developed complete heart block, four undergoing reoperation for recurrent obstruction, and one preoperatively had right bundle branch block from previous ventricular septal defect repair. At mid-term follow-up there was no increase in AR or LVOT gradient (14.8+/-12.8 mmHg). Early post-operative AR was the strongest predictor of late mild/moderate AR (P = 0.02). Early post-operative gradient was a weaker predictor (P = 0.04). Pre-operative and early post-operative gradient were significant predictors of late gradient (P = 0.0038; <0.0001, respectively). No patient required reoperation for recurrent obstruction; one underwent late aortic valve replacement for severe AR.
CONCLUSIONS: An aggressive surgical approach to discrete subaortic stenosis produces excellent relief of obstruction and frees the valve leaflets, significantly reducing associated AR at early and mid-term follow-up with low morbidity for primary operation. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm whether this early benefit is maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10386409     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00060-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  15 in total

1.  Subaortic membrane mimicking hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mark Joseph Anderson; Adelaide Arruda-Olson; Bernard Gersh; Jeffrey Geske
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-04

2.  Echocardiographic follow-up of children with isolated discrete subaortic stenosis.

Authors:  Kadir Babaoglu; Ayse Guler Eroglu; Funda Oztunç; Levent Saltik; Tevfik Demir; Gulay Ahunbay; Alper Guzeltas; Gürkan Cetin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Recurrent discrete subaortic stenosis and small aortic annulus successfully repaired by the Konno procedure in a young woman.

Authors:  Ichiro Kashima; Toshihiko Ueda; Toshiyuki Katogi; Shinichi Taguchi; Yoshito Inoue; Kiyoshi Koizumi
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-10

4.  When Is It Better to Wait? Surgical Timing and Recurrence Risk for Children Undergoing Repair of Subaortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Brett R Anderson; Jennifer E Tingo; Julie S Glickstein; Paul J Chai; Emile A Bacha; Alejandro J Torres
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Routine Septal Myectomy During Subaortic Stenosis Membrane Resection: Effect on Recurrence Rates.

Authors:  Alyssa A Mazurek; Sunkyung Yu; Ray Lowery; Richard G Ohye
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  [Epidemiological, clinical and echographic profile of patients operated for subvalvular aortic stenosis in the region of Sfax (Tunisia) and factors associated with postoperative recurrence: an observational study].

Authors:  Amine Bahloul; Selma Charfeddine; Dorra Abid; Rania Hammami; Leila Abid; Samir Kammoun
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2022-04-08

7.  Evaluation of subvalvular aortic stenosis in children: a 16-year single-center experience.

Authors:  Fahrettin Uysal; Ozlem Mehtap Bostan; Isik Senkaya Signak; Evren Semizel; Ergun Cil
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Discrete subaortic stenosis: surgical outcomes and follow-up results.

Authors:  Osman Tansel Darcin; Tahir Yagdi; Yuksel Atay; Cagatay Engin; Erturk Levent; Suat Buket; Emin Alp Alayunt
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2003

9.  Paediatric subaortic stenosis: long-term outcome and risk factors for reoperation.

Authors:  Rik De Wolf; Katrien François; Thierry Bové; Ilse Coomans; Katya De Groote; Hans De Wilde; Joseph Panzer; Kristof Vandekerckhove; Daniël De Wolf
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

10.  Computational Assessment of Valvular Dysfunction in Discrete Subaortic Stenosis: A Parametric Study.

Authors:  Jason A Shar; Sundeep G Keswani; K Jane Grande-Allen; Philippe Sucosky
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.305

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.