Literature DB >> 10384970

The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women.

K Kenton1, S Shott, L Brubaker.   

Abstract

Fluoroscopic parameters of the rectum in women with pelvic organ prolapse were studied. Ninety-eight consecutive women undergoing reconstructive pelvic surgery completed a urogynecologic history with physical examination and pelvic floor fluoroscopy. The presence of rectocele and contrast trapping was determined on each fluoroscopic study. Each frame of the study was measured to determine the rectal width. Seventy-eight per cent of the women had fluoroscopically demonstrated rectoceles. Their maximum and minimum rectal widths were larger than those of women without rectoceles. Contrast-retaining rectoceles were larger than non-contrast retaining rectoceles. Fluoroscopic evidence of contrast retention did not relate to patient symptoms. There was no difference in the grade of posterior wall prolapse in women with and without rectoceles. Rectoceles have anatomic and functional variability. Fluoroscopy may be a valuable adjunct to the physical examination in assisting gynecologic surgeons to refine their surgical approach for rectocele repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10384970     DOI: 10.1007/pl00004019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  18 in total

Review 1.  Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management.

Authors:  A P Zbar; A Lienemann; H Fritsch; M Beer-Gabel; M Pescatori
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Structural position of the posterior vagina and pelvic floor in women with and without posterior vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Aisha Yousuf; Kindra A Larson; Dee E Fenner; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Posterior vaginal compartment prolapse and defecatory dysfunction: are they related?

Authors:  Cara L Grimes; Emily S Lukacz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Rectocele--does the size matter?

Authors:  Dan Carter; Marc Beer Gabel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Posterior pelvic floor dysfunction: there is an immediate need to standardize terminology.

Authors:  Marco Soligo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-04

6.  A new rectovaginal fascial plication technique for treatment of rectocele with obstructed defecation: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Karin Schmidlin-Enderli; Bernhard Schuessler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Correlation between posterior vaginal wall defects assessed by clinical examination and by defecography.

Authors:  Annette G Groenendijk; Victor P van der Hulst; Erwin Birnie; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-05-09

8.  Comparison of measurement systems for posterior vaginal wall prolapse on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bing Xie; Luyun Chen; Zhuowei Xue; Emily M English; Dee E Fenner; Kara Gaetke-Udager; Giselle E Kolenic; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Female pelvic floor dysfunction--an imaging perspective.

Authors:  Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  Rectocele and intussusception: is there any coherence in symptoms or additional pelvic floor disorders?

Authors:  R Hausammann; T Steffen; D Weishaupt; U Beutner; F H Hetzer
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.