Literature DB >> 22890282

A new rectovaginal fascial plication technique for treatment of rectocele with obstructed defecation: a proof of concept study.

Karin Schmidlin-Enderli1, Bernhard Schuessler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to investigate the functional and anatomical outcome after a new rectovaginal fascial plication technique in patients with rectoceles or rectal pockets and obstructed defecation.
METHODS: In a prospective study 54 of 87 patients were examined pre- and postoperatively using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system of the International Continence Society (ICS). Bowel and protrusion symptoms as well as quality of life (QOL) were evaluated by a standardized questionnaire. Surgical therapy consisted of a posterior vaginal wall incision in the midline, a dissection of the vaginal epithelium from the underlying rectovaginal fascia while the rectocele was brought under tension by the index finger in the rectum. Under rectal digital control the surgically exposed rectovaginal fascia was sutured in a cranio-caudal fashion with sagittally positioned running absorbable sutures followed by a careful reapproximation of the laterally separated perineal body in the midline.
RESULTS: Obstructed defecation symptoms were cured or improved in 72.2 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 59.1-82.4]. Anatomical cure rate was 92.1 % (95 % CI 79.2-97.3) and protrusion symptoms were resolved in 73.6 % (95 % CI 58.0-85.0). Of the patients who had intercourse, 5.2 % reported de novo dyspareunia postoperatively; in none of these patients was an anatomical cause found. There were no major intra- or postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal rectovaginal fascial plication in symptomatic rectoceles or functionally relevant rectal pockets is associated with a satisfactory anatomical and functional cure rate without impacting sexual function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22890282     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1911-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  28 in total

1.  Structural anatomy of the posterior pelvic compartment as it relates to rectocele.

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Matthew D Barber; Tristi W Muir; Mark D Walters
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Endorectal repair of rectocele revisited.

Authors:  I T Khubchandani; J P Clancy; L Rosen; R D Riether; J J Stasik
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Midline fascial plication under continuous digital transrectal control: which factors determine anatomic outcome?

Authors:  Alfredo L Milani; Mariella I J Withagen; Karlijn J Schweitzer; Erica W M Janszen; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A M Weber; M D Walters; M R Piedmonte
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles.

Authors:  P K Sand; S Koduri; R W Lobel; H A Winkler; J Tomezsko; P J Culligan; R Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy.

Authors:  Yoram Abramov; Sanjay Gandhi; Roger P Goldberg; Sylvia M Botros; Christina Kwon; Peter K Sand
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  K Singh; W M Reid; L A Berger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair.

Authors:  G W Cundiff; A C Weidner; A G Visco; W A Addison; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  4 in total

1.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Surgical interventions for posterior compartment prolapse and obstructed defecation symptoms: a systematic review with clinical practice recommendations.

Authors:  Cara L Grimes; Megan O Schimpf; Cecilia K Wieslander; Ambereen Sleemi; Paula Doyle; You Maria Wu; Ruchira Singh; Ethan M Balk; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Management of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Kyung Hwa Choi; Jae Yup Hong
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-11-10

4.  Outcomes of a modified Bresler procedure for the treatment of rectocele with rectal intussusception.

Authors:  Qun Deng; Kai-Lin Yu; Zhi-Yong Liu; Zhong Shen; Ya-Hui Wang; Yong-Mao Song; Chang-Jian Wang; Xiao-Ping Xu; Jian-Wei Wang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2020-07-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.