Literature DB >> 10380673

Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: effects of formant contour.

J M Hillenbrand1, T M Nearey.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the role of formant frequency movements in vowel recognition. Measurements of vowel duration, fundamental frequency, and formant contours were taken from a database of acoustic measurements of 1668 /hVd/ utterances spoken by 45 men, 48 women, and 46 children [Hillenbrand et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3099-3111 (1995)]. A 300-utterance subset was selected from this database, representing equal numbers of 12 vowels and approximately equal numbers of tokens produced by men, women, and children. Listeners were asked to identify the original, naturally produced signals and two formant-synthesized versions. One set of "original formant" (OF) synthetic signals was generated using the measured formant contours, and a second set of "flat formant" (FF) signals was synthesized with formant frequencies fixed at the values measured at the steadiest portion of the vowel. Results included: (a) the OF synthetic signals were identified with substantially greater accuracy than the FF signals; and (b) the naturally produced signals were identified with greater accuracy than the OF synthetic signals. Pattern recognition results showed that a simple approach to vowel specification based on duration, steady-state F0, and formant frequency measurements at 20% and 80% of vowel duration accounts for much but by no means all of the variation in listeners' labeling of the three types of stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10380673     DOI: 10.1121/1.424676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Identification of synthetic vowels based on a time-varying model of the vocal tract area function.

Authors:  Kate Bunton; Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Cochlea-scaled entropy, not consonants, vowels, or time, best predicts speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Kelly Tremblay; Christopher G Clinard; Richard A Wright; Elad Sagi; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of spectral modulation filtering on vowel identification.

Authors:  Chang Liu; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of silent-center syllables by native and non-native English speakers.

Authors:  Catherine L Rogers; Alexandra S Lopez
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Vowel acoustics in Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis: comparison of clear, loud, and slow speaking conditions.

Authors:  Kris Tjaden; Jennifer Lam; Greg Wilding
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Perception of complete and incomplete formant transitions in vowels.

Authors:  Pierre Divenyi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels.

Authors:  Robert Allen Fox; Ewa Jacewicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Nonlinear auditory models yield new insights into representations of vowels.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Joyce M McDonough
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech.

Authors:  Christian Stilp; Gail Donaldson; Soohee Oh; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.