Literature DB >> 10374986

Rationale and derivation of MI and TI--a review.

J G Abbott1.   

Abstract

This review article provides a summary rationale and derivation for the mechanical index (MI) and thermal index (TI) formulas presented in the body of the "Standard for real-time display of thermal and mechanical acoustic output indices on diagnostic ultrasound equipment" (AIUM/NEMA 1998). For purposes of simplicity, this standard is referred to in this article by its colloquial "nickname," the "output display standard" or ODS. This review expands on the summary information provided in Appendix A of the ODS. Numerous references are made to the root publications from which the formulas were derived. As will be discussed in the derivation notes that follow, key parts of the MI and TI models rely heavily on experimental data. This document does not attempt to do any more than describe the relevant results of the experiments. A general overview is provided in the Introduction and Rationale for the nontechnical reader and the more rigorous Models and Derivation Notes provides a detailed mathematical review of the MI and TI models. A complete set of defined terms is provided in Appendix 1.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10374986     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00172-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  25 in total

1.  Determination of postexcitation thresholds for single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles using double passive cavitation detection.

Authors:  Daniel A King; Michael J Malloy; Alayna C Roberts; Alexander Haak; Christian C Yoder; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Ultrasound contrast agents--physical basics].

Authors:  C Kollmann; M Putzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  A model for estimating ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path to the fetus from backscattered waveforms.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  High-frequency dynamics of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Dustin E Kruse; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Our unborn children at risk?

Authors:  V S Caviness; P E Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The risk of exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in postnatal subjects: thermal effects.

Authors:  William D O'Brien; Cheri X Deng; Gerald R Harris; Bruce A Herman; Christopher R Merritt; Naren Sanghvi; James F Zachary
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Simultaneous Axial Multifocal Imaging Using a Single Acoustical Transmission: A Practical Implementation.

Authors:  Asaf Ilovitsh; Tali Ilovitsh; Josquin Foiret; Douglas N Stephens; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects.

Authors:  Boris Krasovitski; Victor Frenkel; Shy Shoham; Eitan Kimmel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Multi-Focus Beamforming for Thermal Strain Imaging Using a Single Ultrasound Linear Array Transducer.

Authors:  Man M Nguyen; Xuan Ding; Steven A Leers; Kang Kim
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.