AIM: The main purpose of this study was to develop a reliable and valid instrument to measure patient satisfaction with nursing care. BACKGROUND: The interest in patient satisfaction is intense but there is an absence of instruments with proper psychometric properties. METHODS: A methodological exploratory design was employed with three phases: content development and critique, pilot study (N = 15) and final tryout (I = 103). FINDINGS: The reliability coefficient for the whole scale was high (alpha = 0.94). An exploratory factor analysis revealed six factors, explaining 68.8% of the variability. The first three factors referred to interpersonal relationships and available time, technical competence and response, and information. The qualitative data facilitated the interpretation of the quantitative data, increased the validity of the scale and gave useful information for improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the psychometric properties of the instruments were satisfactory but there is a need for continuous evaluation and verification of other studies.
AIM: The main purpose of this study was to develop a reliable and valid instrument to measure patient satisfaction with nursing care. BACKGROUND: The interest in patient satisfaction is intense but there is an absence of instruments with proper psychometric properties. METHODS: A methodological exploratory design was employed with three phases: content development and critique, pilot study (N = 15) and final tryout (I = 103). FINDINGS: The reliability coefficient for the whole scale was high (alpha = 0.94). An exploratory factor analysis revealed six factors, explaining 68.8% of the variability. The first three factors referred to interpersonal relationships and available time, technical competence and response, and information. The qualitative data facilitated the interpretation of the quantitative data, increased the validity of the scale and gave useful information for improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the psychometric properties of the instruments were satisfactory but there is a need for continuous evaluation and verification of other studies.
Authors: Vassilis H Aletras; Arsenis Kostarelis; Maria Tsitouridou; Dimitris Niakas; Anna Nicolaou Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: An Chen; Henni Tenhunen; Paulus Torkki; Antti Peltokorpi; Seppo Heinonen; Paul Lillrank; Vedran Stefanovic Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 3.007