Literature DB >> 10372082

The interaction of otolith and proprioceptive information in the perception of verticality. The effects of labyrinthine and CNS disease.

A M Bronstein1.   

Abstract

A review of recent experiments in patients with labyrinthine and neurological disorders assessing the subjective postural vertical (SPV) and the subjective visual vertical (SVV) is presented. The SPV was measured with subjects (Ss) seated in a motorized flight simulator tilting at 1.5 deg/s in roll and pitch; the Ss' task was to indicate when they entered and left self-verticality. The SVV was measured by Ss adjusting a straight line to what they perceived as gravitational upright. Clear dissociations between the SVV and SPV were found, for example, patients with acute unilateral vestibular disorders had marked tilts of the SVV toward the side of the lesion but a "lean" (bias, tilt) of the SPV was never found. Dissociations of the SPV and SVV could also be induced in normal subjects by roll-plane visual motion stimuli: the SVV was tilted in the direction of motion, but the SPV was not. Prolonged lateral body tilt did, however, bias the SVV (the "A" effect) and the SPV, but these effects are likely to be mediated by somatosensory rather than otolithic input. Evidence for the latter came from (i) findings in patients with absent vestibular function, who showed an enhanced "A" effect, and (ii) from a patient with a thalamic infarction, who showed absence of the "A" effect when leaning on the hemihypesthetic side. In separate experiments where normal Ss indicated space-vertical and space-horizontal with saccadic eye movements, we found differences between these percepts, that is, subjective external space lost orthogonality. The findings in these various experiments can be interpreted if we abandon the idea of a single, "internal representation" of verticality. Different sensory modalities convey different and sometimes conflicting messages about verticality. Otolithic and somatosensory signals can have opposite sign effects during verticality estimates while tilted. In man, somatosensory cues have a prominent role in verticality perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10372082     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09195.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  46 in total

1.  Role of gravity-based information on the orientation and localization of the perceived body midline.

Authors:  Hadrien Ceyte; Corinne Cian; Vincent Nougier; Isabelle Olivier; Marion Trousselard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation of postural orientation to changes in surface inclination.

Authors:  Joann Kluzik; Robert J Peterka; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Judging beforehand the possibility of passing under obstacles without motion: the influence of egocentric and geocentric frames of reference.

Authors:  L Bringoux; G Robic; G M Gauthier; J L Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Does proprioception contribute to the sense of verticality?

Authors:  Guillaume Barbieri; Anne-Sophie Gissot; Florent Fouque; Jean-Marie Casillas; Thierry Pozzo; Dominic Pérennou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Head roll dependent variability of subjective visual vertical and ocular counterroll.

Authors:  Alexander A Tarnutzer; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Ageing of the postural vertical.

Authors:  Guillaume Barbieri; Anne-Sophie Gissot; Dominic Pérennou
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2009-08-27

7.  Antihysteresis of perceived longitudinal body axis during continuous quasi-static whole-body rotation in the earth-vertical roll plane.

Authors:  M Tatalias; C J Bockisch; G Bertolini; D Straumann; A Palla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Selected ENT symptoms in functional disorders of the upper cervical spine and temporomandibular joints.

Authors:  M Hölzl; R Behrmann; E Biesinger; W von Heymann; R Hülse; U R Goessler; C Arens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Head direction cell activity in mice: robust directional signal depends on intact otolith organs.

Authors:  Ryan M Yoder; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Gravity estimation and verticality perception.

Authors:  Christopher J Dakin; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.