Literature DB >> 10369732

Bone response to in vivo mechanical loading in C3H/HeJ mice.

E A Pedersen1, M P Akhter, D M Cullen, D B Kimmel, R R Recker.   

Abstract

Bone, being sensitive to mechanical stimulus, adapts to mechanical loads in response to bending or deformation. Although the signal/receptor mechanism for bone adaptation to deformation is still under investigation, the mechanical signal is related to the amount of bone deformation or strain. Adaptation to changes in physical activity depends on both the magnitude of increase in strain above average daily levels for maintaining current bone density and the Minimum Effective Strain (MES) for initiating adaptive bone formation. Given the variation of peak bone density that exists in any human population, it is likely that variation in levels for MES is, to a considerable degree, inherited and varies among animal species and breeds. This study showed a dose-related periosteal response to loading in C3H/HeJ mice. The extent of active formation surface, the rate of periosteal bone formation, and area of bone formation increased with increasing peak periosteal strain. In these mice, the loaded tibia consistently showed lower endocortical formation surface and mineral apposition rate than the nonloaded bones at every load level. Although periosteal expansion is the most efficient means of increasing moment of inertia in adaptation to bending, a dose response increase in endocortical formation would have been predicted. Our characterization of the mouse bone formation response to increasing bending loads will be useful in the design of experiments to study the tibial adaptive response to known loads in different mouse breeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10369732     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  10 in total

1.  Cancellous bone adaptation to in vivo loading in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Timothy G Morgan; Xu Yang; Todd H Baldini; Elizabeth R Myers; Timothy M Wright; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Alternative splicing in bone following mechanical loading.

Authors:  Sara M Mantila Roosa; Yunlong Liu; Charles H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  32 wk old C3H/HeJ mice actively respond to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Sandra L Poliachik; DeWayne Threet; Sundar Srinivasan; Ted S Gross
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Bone cross-sectional geometry in male runners, gymnasts, swimmers and non-athletic controls: a hip-structural analysis study.

Authors:  Karen Hind; Lisa Gannon; Emma Whatley; Carlton Cooke; John Truscott
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Dynamic hydraulic flow stimulation on mitigation of trabecular bone loss in a rat functional disuse model.

Authors:  Minyi Hu; Jiqi Cheng; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Impacts of Robotic Compliance and Bone Bending on Simulated in vivo Knee Kinematics.

Authors:  Rebecca J Nesbitt; Nathaniel A Bates; Teja D Karkhanis; Grant Schaffner; Jason T Shearn
Journal:  Am J Biomed Eng       Date:  2016

7.  Leptin receptor (Lepr) is a negative modulator of bone mechanosensitivity and genetic variations in Lepr may contribute to the differential osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in the C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ pair of mouse strains.

Authors:  Sonia Kapur; Mehran Amoui; Chandrasekhar Kesavan; Xiaoguang Wang; Subburaman Mohan; David J Baylink; K-H William Lau
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Noninvasive loading of the murine tibia: an in vivo model for the study of mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Ted S Gross; Sundar Srinivasan; Chung C Liu; Thomas L Clemens; Steven D Bain
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Frequency-dependent enhancement of bone formation in murine tibiae and femora with knee loading.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Shigeo M Tanaka; Qiwei Sun; Charles H Turner; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Dynamic hydraulic fluid stimulation regulated intramedullary pressure.

Authors:  Minyi Hu; Frederick Serra-Hsu; Neville Bethel; Liangjun Lin; Suzanne Ferreri; Jiqi Cheng; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.398

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.