Literature DB >> 10368428

Physicochemical optimization in the genetic code origin as the number of codified amino acids increases.

M Di Giulio1, M Medugno.   

Abstract

We have assumed that the coevolution theory of genetic code origin (Wong JT, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:1909-1912, 1975) is essentially correct. This theory makes it possible to identify at least 10 evolutionary stages through which genetic code organization might have passed prior to reaching its current form. The calculation of the minimization level of all these evolutionary stages leads to the following conclusions. (1) The minimization percentages increased linearly with the number of amino acids codified in the codes of the various evolutionary stages when only the sense changes are considered in the analysis. This seems to favor the physicochemical theory of genetic code origin even if, as discussed in the paper, this observation is also compatible with the coevolution theory. (2) For the first seven evolutionary stages of the genetic code, this trend is less clear and indeed is inverted when we consider the global optimisation of the codes due to both sense changes and synonymous changes. This inverse correlation between minimization percentages and the number of amino acids codified in the codes of the intermediate stages seems to favor neither the physicochemical nor the stereochemical theories of genetic code origin, as it is in the early and intermediate stages of code development that these theories would expect minimization to have played a crucial role, and this does not seem to be the case. However, these results are in agreement with the coevolution theory, which attributes a role to the physicochemical properties of amino acids that, while important, is nevertheless subordinate to the mechanism which concedes codons from the precursor amino acids to the product amino acids as the primary factor determining the evolutionary structuring of the genetic code. The results are therefore discussed in the context of the various theories proposed to explain genetic code origin.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10368428     DOI: 10.1007/pl00006522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  18 in total

1.  Testing a biosynthetic theory of the genetic code: fact or artifact?

Authors:  T A Ronneberg; L F Landweber; S J Freeland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The early phases of genetic code origin: conjectures on the evolution of coded catalysis.

Authors:  Massimo Di Giulio
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 3.  The case for an error minimizing standard genetic code.

Authors:  Stephen J Freeland; Tao Wu; Nick Keulmann
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.950

4.  Combinatorial mutagenesis to restrict amino acid usage in an enzyme to a reduced set.

Authors:  Satoshi Akanuma; Takanori Kigawa; Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  No accident: genetic codes freeze in error-correcting patterns of the standard genetic code.

Authors:  David H Ardell; Guy Sella
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Amino acid homochirality may be linked to the origin of phosphate-based life.

Authors:  Da Xiong Han; Hai Yan Wang; Zhi Liang Ji; An Fu Hu; Yu Fen Zhao
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  A neutral origin for error minimization in the genetic code.

Authors:  Steven E Massey
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Pathways of Genetic Code Evolution in Ancient and Modern Organisms.

Authors:  Supratim Sengupta; Paul G Higgs
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  A Non-neutral Origin for Error Minimization in the Origin of the Genetic Code.

Authors:  Massimo Di Giulio
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Revisiting the physico-chemical hypothesis of code origin: an analysis based on code-sequence coevolution in a finite population.

Authors:  Ashutosh Vishwa Bandhu; Neha Aggarwal; Supratim Sengupta
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 1.950

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.