Literature DB >> 10366144

Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas.

M A Riopel1, B M Ronnett, R J Kurman.   

Abstract

Histologic criteria for the distinction of ovarian mucinous borderline tumors (MBTs) from invasive mucinous carcinomas (MUCCAs) and the definitions of intraepithelial (noninvasive) carcinoma and microinvasion are controversial. Accurate assessment of the behavior of these tumors has been obscured by inclusion of cases of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), an entity of extraovarian origin, and misclassification of the ovarian tumors in PMP and metastatic mucinous carcinomas (METCAs) as either advanced-stage MBTs or primary ovarian MUCCAs. One hundred thirty-six intestinal-type ovarian mucinous tumors without PMP were evaluated for the presence of stromal invasion, marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three cell layers, and necrosis. Criteria for the diagnosis of MBT, MBT with intraepithelial carcinoma, MBT with microinvasion (MIBT), MUCCA, and METCA were established and correlated with behavior. Twenty-three (59%) of 39 patients whose tumors had stromal invasion of more than 5 mm died of disease. Stromal invasion of more than 5 mm was the sole feature that correlated with a poor prognosis. In the absence of this feature, marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three layers, microinvasion (<5 mm), or necrosis did not have an adverse effect on survival. Tumors were classified as MBT (n = 65; 48%) based on absence of stromal invasion, regardless of degree of cytologic atypia or epithelial stratification; of these, 28 (43%) qualified as intraepithelial carcinoma based on epithelial stratification of more than three cell layers or marked cytologic atypia. Tumors with stromal invasion of less than 5 mm were classified as MIBT (n = 8; 6%). Tumors with stromal invasion of more than 5 mm were classified as MUCCA (n = 24; 18%). Tumors with a nodular pattern of stromal invasion, morphology inconsistent with ovarian origin, or a primary site elsewhere were classified as METCA (n = 35; 26%). Four tumors could not be definitively classified. Of the 86 cases with follow-up (median, 33 months) all MBTs (n = 44) and MIBTs (n = 6) were stage I, with 5-year survival rates of 100%. MUCCAs (n = 17) that were stage I had a 5-year survival rate of 91%; all patients with advanced-stage MUCCA died of disease. Five-year survival rate for METCAs (n = 19) was 11%. METCAs were more common than MUCCAs but can mimic MUCCAs and MBTs clinically and histologically. In the absence of a primary site elsewhere, METCA should be strongly suspected when there is bilateral surface involvement and a characteristic nodular pattern of invasion. It is important to recognize this pattern because 5-year survival rate for METCA (11%) was substantially less than that of MUCCA (all stages, 51%) and MBT (100%). Because all MBTs, regardless of degree of atypia or stratification, were stage I and benign, we prefer to designate them as atypical proliferative mucinous tumors. Marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three layers, and microinvasion (<5 mm) had no effect on the behavior of MBT. Noninvasive mucinous tumors with marked cytologic atypia or excessive epithelial stratification can be interpreted as atypical proliferative tumors with intraepithelial carcinoma and those with microinvasion can be designated as atypical proliferative tumors with microinvasion; these tumors appear to represent transitional stages in ovarian mucinous carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10366144     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199906000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  39 in total

1.  Advanced stage mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary is both rare and highly lethal: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Richard J Zaino; Mark F Brady; Subodh M Lele; Helen Michael; Benjamin Greer; Michael A Bookman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Effects of Gastrointestinal-Type Chemotherapy in Women With Ovarian Mucinous Carcinoma.

Authors:  Katherine C Kurnit; Abdulrahman K Sinno; Bryan M Fellman; Aaron Varghese; Rebecca Stone; Anil K Sood; David M Gershenson; Kathleen M Schmeler; Anais Malpica; Amanda N Fader; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Unmasking the complexities of mucinous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael Frumovitz; Kathleen M Schmeler; Anais Malpica; Anil K Sood; David M Gershenson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Massively parallel sequencing analysis of mucinous ovarian carcinomas: genomic profiling and differential diagnoses.

Authors:  Jennifer J Mueller; Brooke A Schlappe; Rahul Kumar; Narciso Olvera; Fanny Dao; Nadeem Abu-Rustum; Carol Aghajanian; Deborah DeLair; Yaser R Hussein; Robert A Soslow; Douglas A Levine; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  [Histological grading of epithelial ovarian cancer. Review and recommendation].

Authors:  S Hauptmann; A du Bois; I Meinhold-Herlein; J Pfisterer; S Avril
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  HER2-positive mucinous adenocarcinomas of the ovary have an expansile invasive pattern associated with a favorable prognosis.

Authors:  Sang Kyum Kim; Nam Hoon Cho
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-06-15

Review 7.  Mucinous tumors of the ovary: current thoughts on diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Jubilee Brown; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Mucinous adenocarcinoma involving the ovary: comparative evaluation of the classification algorithms using tumor size and laterality.

Authors:  Eun Sun Jung; Jeong Hoon Bae; Ahwon Lee; Yeong Jin Choi; Jong-Sup Park; Kyo-Young Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  [Mucinous ovarian neoplasms. Prognostically mostly excellent, infrequently a wolf in sheep's clothing].

Authors:  S Lax; A Staebler
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 10.  Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis.

Authors:  Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.