OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with improved survival compared with standard gynecologic regimens for women with ovarian mucinous carcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy at two academic centers. Demographic and clinical information was abstracted from the medical records. Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy contained 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, or oxaliplatin. Gynecologic regimens included standard carboplatin or cisplatin. Bevacizumab treatment was allowed in both groups. Summary statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics; Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator was used to compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients received either gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy (n=26; 50%) or a standard gynecologic regimen (n=26; 50%). Three-quarters of tumors were early-stage (I or II), 68% grade 1 or 2 and 88% of patients had no gross residual disease after surgery. Patients receiving gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy were more likely to receive bevacizumab (50% vs 4%; P<.001), but there were no other differences in clinical or demographic characteristics. Unadjusted overall survival analyses showed that gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.8), as were early stage tumors and having no gross residual disease. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab was associated with improved survival and should be considered in patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma requiring adjuvant therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with improved survival compared with standard gynecologic regimens for women with ovarian mucinous carcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy at two academic centers. Demographic and clinical information was abstracted from the medical records. Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy contained 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, or oxaliplatin. Gynecologic regimens included standard carboplatin or cisplatin. Bevacizumab treatment was allowed in both groups. Summary statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics; Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator was used to compare survival outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients received either gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy (n=26; 50%) or a standard gynecologic regimen (n=26; 50%). Three-quarters of tumors were early-stage (I or II), 68% grade 1 or 2 and 88% of patients had no gross residual disease after surgery. Patients receiving gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy were more likely to receive bevacizumab (50% vs 4%; P<.001), but there were no other differences in clinical or demographic characteristics. Unadjusted overall survival analyses showed that gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.8), as were early stage tumors and having no gross residual disease. CONCLUSION: Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab was associated with improved survival and should be considered in patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma requiring adjuvant therapy.
Authors: F M Muggia; P S Braly; M F Brady; G Sutton; T H Niemann; S L Lentz; R D Alvarez; P R Kucera; J M Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeffrey Bell; Mark F Brady; Robert C Young; Janice Lage; Joan L Walker; Katherine Y Look; G Scott Rose; Nick M Spirtos Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2006-07-24 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Mary L Gemignani; Alan C Schlaerth; Faina Bogomolniy; Richard R Barakat; Oscar Lin; Robert Soslow; Ennapandam Venkatraman; Jeff Boyd Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Michael A Bookman; Mark F Brady; William P McGuire; Peter G Harper; David S Alberts; Michael Friedlander; Nicoletta Colombo; Jeffrey M Fowler; Peter A Argenta; Koen De Geest; David G Mutch; Robert A Burger; Ann Marie Swart; Edward L Trimble; Chrisann Accario-Winslow; Lawrence M Roth Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Viviane Hess; Roger A'Hern; Nazar Nasiri; D Michael King; Peter R Blake; Desmond P J Barton; John H Shepherd; T Ind; J Bridges; K Harrington; Stanley B Kaye; Martin E Gore Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Martin Gore; Allan Hackshaw; William E Brady; Richard T Penson; Richard Zaino; W Glenn McCluggage; Raji Ganesan; Nafisa Wilkinson; Timothy Perren; Ana Montes; Jeffrey Summers; Rosemary Lord; Graham Dark; Gordon Rustin; Melanie Mackean; Nicholas Reed; Sean Kehoe; Michael Frumovitz; Helen Christensen; Amanda Feeney; Jonathan Ledermann; David M Gershenson Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-04-18 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Veronika Auner; Gernot Kriegshäuser; Dan Tong; Reinhard Horvat; Alexander Reinthaller; Alexander Mustea; Robert Zeillinger Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 4.430