Literature DB >> 10360845

The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics.

T W Schnider1, C F Minto, S L Shafer, P L Gambus, C Andresen, D B Goodale, E J Youngs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors studied the influence of age on the pharmacodynamics of propofol, including characterization of the relation between plasma concentration and the time course of drug effect.
METHODS: The authors evaluated healthy volunteers aged 25-81 yr. A bolus dose (2 mg/kg or 1 mg/kg in persons older than 65 yr) and an infusion (25, 50, 100, or 200 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) of the older or the new (containing EDTA) formulation of propofol were given on each of two different study days. The propofol concentration was determined in frequent arterial samples. The electroencephalogram (EEG) was used to measure drug effect. A statistical technique called semilinear canonical correlation was used to select components of the EEG power spectrum that correlated optimally with the effect-site concentration. The effect-site concentration was related to drug effect with a biphasic pharmacodynamic model. The plasma effect-site equilibration rate constant was estimated parametrically. Estimates of this rate constant were validated by comparing the predicted time of peak effect with the time of peak EEG effect. The probability of being asleep, as a function of age, was determined from steady state concentrations after 60 min of propofol infusion.
RESULTS: Twenty-four volunteers completed the study. Three parameters of the biphasic pharmacodynamic model were correlated linearly with age. The plasma effect-site equilibration rate constant was 0.456 min(-1). The predicted time to peak effect after bolus injection ranging was 1.7 min. The time to peak effect assessed visually was 1.6 min (range, 1-2.4 min). The steady state observations showed increasing sensitivity to propofol in elderly patients, with C50 values for loss of consciousness of 2.35, 1.8, and 1.25 microg/ml in volunteers who were 25, 50, and 75 yr old, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Semilinear canonical correlation defined a new measure of propofol effect on the EEG, the canonical univariate parameter for propofol. Using this parameter, propofol plasma effect-site equilibration is faster than previously reported. This fast onset was confirmed by inspection of the EEG data. Elderly patients are more sensitive to the hypnotic and EEG effects of propofol than are younger persons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10360845     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  145 in total

1.  Neural network modeling to predict the hypnotic effect of propofol bolus induction.

Authors:  Chao-Shun Lin; Yu-Chuan Li; Martin S Mok; Chi-Chen Wu; Hung-Wen Chiu; Yu-Hwa Lin
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

2.  A randomized controlled trial of the effect of preoperative dexmedetomidine on the half maximal effective concentration of propofol for successful i-gel insertion without muscle relaxants.

Authors:  Young-Eun Jang; Yong-Chul Kim; Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Young-Tae Jeon; Jung-Won Hwang; Eugene Kim; Hee-Pyoung Park
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  A beat-by-beat, on-line, cardiovascular index, CARDEAN, to assess circulatory responses to surgery: a randomized clinical trial during spine surgery.

Authors:  M Rossi; A Cividjian; M C Fevre; M E Oddoux; J Carcey; C Halle; M Frost; M Gardellin; J F Payen; L Quintin
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  A two-compartment effect site model describes the bispectral index after different rates of propofol infusion.

Authors:  Marcus A Björnsson; Ake Norberg; Sigridur Kalman; Mats O Karlsson; Ulrika S H Simonsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Induction speed is not a determinant of propofol pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Anthony G Doufas; Maryam Bakhshandeh; Andrew R Bjorksten; Steven L Shafer; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  [Effect compartment equilibration and time-to-peak effect. Importance of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic principle for the daily clinical practice].

Authors:  J Bruhn; P M Schumacher; T W Bouillon
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Effect-compartment equilibrium rate constant (keo) for propofol during induction of anesthesia with a target-controlled infusion device.

Authors:  Thiam Aun Lim; Wai Hong Wong; Kin Yuee Lim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Anesthetic properties of a propofol microemulsion in dogs.

Authors:  Timothy E Morey; Jerome H Modell; Dushyant Shekhawat; Dinesh O Shah; Brian Klatt; George P Thomas; Frank A Kero; Matthew M Booth; Donn M Dennis
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Optimal remifentanil dosage for intubation without muscle relaxants in elderly patients.

Authors:  Eui-Kyoung Goo; Ah-Young Oh; Suk-Ju Cho; Kwang-Suk Seo; Young-Tae Jeon
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Automated titration of propofol and remifentanil decreases the anesthesiologist's workload during vascular or thoracic surgery: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Corinne Dussaussoy; Marine Peres; Virginie Jaoul; Ngai Liu; Thierry Chazot; Jean Picquet; Marc Fischler; Laurent Beydon
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.