Literature DB >> 16633780

Effect-compartment equilibrium rate constant (keo) for propofol during induction of anesthesia with a target-controlled infusion device.

Thiam Aun Lim1, Wai Hong Wong, Kin Yuee Lim.   

Abstract

The effect-compartment concentration (C(e)) of a drug at a specific pharmacodynamic endpoint should be independent of the rate of drug injection. We used this assumption to derive an effect-compartment equilibrium rate constant (k(eo)) for propofol during induction of anesthesia, using a target controlled infusion device (Diprifusor). Eighteen unpremedicated patients were induced with a target blood propofol concentration of 5 microg x ml(-1) (group 1), while another 18 were induced with a target concentration of 6 microg x ml(-1) (group 2). The time at loss of the eyelash reflex was recorded. Computer simulation was used to derive the rate constant (k(eo)) that resulted in the mean C(e) at loss of the eyelash reflex in group 1 being equal to that in group 2. Using this population technique, we found the k(eo) to be 0.57 min(-1). The mean (SD) effect compartment concentration at loss of the eyelash reflex was 2.39 (0.70) microg x ml(-1). This means that to achieve a desired C(e) within 3 min of induction, the initial target blood concentration should be set at 1.67 times that of the desired C(e) for 1 min, after which it should revert to the desired concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16633780     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-005-0378-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

1.  Predicted effect compartment concentration of thiopental at loss of eyelash reflex.

Authors:  T A Lim; K Inbasegaran
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  A novel method of deriving the effect compartment equilibrium rate constant for propofol.

Authors:  T A Lim
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children.

Authors:  B Marsh; M White; N Morton; G N Kenny
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Evaluation of the predictive performance of a 'Diprifusor' TCI system.

Authors:  C F Swinhoe; J E Peacock; J B Glen; C S Reilly
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Targeting effect compartment or central compartment concentration of propofol: what predicts loss of consciousness?

Authors:  H G Wakeling; J B Zimmerman; S Howell; P S Glass
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Prediction of movement during propofol/nitrous oxide anesthesia. Performance of concentration, electroencephalographic, pupillary, and hemodynamic indicators.

Authors:  K Leslie; D I Sessler; W D Smith; M D Larson; M Ozaki; D Blanchard; D P Crankshaw
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  T W Schnider; C F Minto; S L Shafer; P L Gambus; C Andresen; D B Goodale; E J Youngs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartment--controlled target-controlled infusion for propofol.

Authors:  M M Struys; T De Smet; B Depoorter; L F Versichelen; E P Mortier; F J Dumortier; S L Shafer; G Rolly
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.892

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.