Literature DB >> 10358528

Nondirectiveness in prenatal genetics: patients read between the lines.

G Anderson1.   

Abstract

For decades questionnaires have been used to measure the cognitive and psychological effects of prenatal genetic testing, but little is known about why some women undergo testing and others decline. Research indicates that many factors influence decision making, including values and beliefs. What is often denied rather than recognized is that the professional and personal values and beliefs held by the health care provider influence the patient's decision. It is assumed that, if genetic services are delivered in a nondirective manner, patients will not be affected by the provider's personal and professional standpoint. The qualitative research data reported here challenge this assumption. Getting to know patients' moral understanding and patterns of ethical reasoning by listening to their personal stories is recommended as a better way for nurses to help patients to make informed and autonomous decisions about prenatal genetic screening or diagnostic tests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10358528     DOI: 10.1177/096973309900600205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  7 in total

Review 1.  State of the science: social, psychological, and ethical nursing research in genetics.

Authors:  G Anderson
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.522

2.  Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view.

Authors:  Jon Weil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Umair Majid; Forum Trivedi; Chanté De Freitas
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

Review 4.  The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: a commentary.

Authors:  Anne C Madeo; Barbara B Biesecker; Campbell Brasington; Lori H Erby; Kathryn F Peters
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Approaching Complex Cases With a Crisis Intervention Model and Teamwork: A Commentary.

Authors:  Anna M Scheyett
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  What parents are told after prenatal diagnosis of a sex chromosome abnormality: interview and questionnaire study.

Authors:  L Abramsky; S Hall; J Levitan; T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-24

7.  Cell-free fetal DNA testing: a pilot study of obstetric healthcare provider attitudes toward clinical implementation.

Authors:  Lauren C Sayres; Megan Allyse; Mary E Norton; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.050

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.