Literature DB >> 11222421

What parents are told after prenatal diagnosis of a sex chromosome abnormality: interview and questionnaire study.

L Abramsky1, S Hall, J Levitan, T M Marteau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how the prenatal diagnosis of a sex chromosome anomaly is first communicated to parents.
DESIGN: Health professionals were interviewed by telephone and the conversation was taped; parents were sent questionnaires at 1 month after diagnosis and those who responded were sent another at 6 months. PARTICIPANTS: 29 health professionals who had recently informed parents that a sex chromosome anomaly had been identified in an apparently anatomically normal, viable fetus. 23 mothers and partners who had been informed of such a diagnosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health professionals' knowledge about sex chromosome anomalies and parents' responses to information provided by health professionals.
RESULTS: Analysis of the telephone interviews identified great variation in what different healthcare professionals know, think, and say about the same sex chromosome anomaly. The small numbers and the low response rate for the questionnaire (39% for women and 30% for men) meant that statistical analysis was not appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: It is essential for obstetric units to have an established protocol for giving results and for all staff who communicate results to parents to have accurate, up to date information about the condition identified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11222421      PMCID: PMC26562          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  14 in total

1.  Decisions following the intrauterine diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy.

Authors:  A Robinson; B G Bender; M G Linden
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1989-12

2.  Parental decisions following prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy: a trend over time.

Authors:  S M Christian; D Koehn; R Pillay; A MacDougall; R D Wilson
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 3.  Psychological issues in genetic counselling.

Authors:  M Reif; H Baitsch
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  The Human Genome Project--an overview.

Authors:  D R Bentley
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.944

6.  Framing of information: its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  1989-03

7.  Some considerations bearing on the doctrine of self-fulfilling prophecy in sex chromosome aneuploidy.

Authors:  M H Puck
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1981

8.  Learning disabilities in children with sex chromosome anomalies.

Authors:  B F Pennington; B Bender; M Puck; J Salbenblatt; A Robinson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1982-10

9.  Child development: what do parents expect?

Authors:  J Edwards-Beckett
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.508

10.  Prognosis of prenatally diagnosed children with sex chromosome aneuploidy.

Authors:  A Robinson; B G Bender; M G Linden
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1992-10-01
View more
  19 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnoses of sex chromosome conditions.

Authors:  B Biesecker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-24

2.  Sex chromosome trisomies in Europe: prevalence, prenatal detection and outcome of pregnancy.

Authors:  Patricia Anne Boyd; Maria Loane; Ester Garne; Babak Khoshnood; Helen Dolk
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Exploring adoption with clients: the need for adoption education within the genetic counseling profession.

Authors:  Cassandra L Perry; Martha J Henry
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Experiences of prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida or hydrocephalus in parents who decide to continue with their pregnancy.

Authors:  Julie Chaplin; Robert Schweitzer; Shelley Perkoulidis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A qualitative exploration of mothers' and fathers' experiences of having a child with Klinefelter syndrome and the process of reaching this diagnosis.

Authors:  Elyssia Bourke; Pamela Snow; Amy Herlihy; David Amor; Sylvia Metcalfe
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Triple X syndrome: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Maarten Otter; Constance T R M Schrander-Stumpel; Leopold M G Curfs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  The Impact of Living with Klinefelter Syndrome: A Qualitative Exploration of Adolescents and Adults.

Authors:  Amy Turriff; Ellen Macnamara; Howard P Levy; Barbara Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Health-care provider communication with expectant parents during a prenatal diagnosis: an integrative review.

Authors:  A L Kratovil; W A Julion
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 9.  Psychological aspects of the treatment of patients with disorders of sex development.

Authors:  David E Sandberg; Melissa Gardner; Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 1.303

Review 10.  Neurocognitive outcomes of individuals with a sex chromosome trisomy: XXX, XYY, or XXY: a systematic review.

Authors:  Victoria Leggett; Patricia Jacobs; Kate Nation; Gaia Scerif; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 5.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.