Literature DB >> 10350523

Mathematical models for predicting indoor air quality from smoking activity.

W R Ott1.   

Abstract

Much progress has been made over four decades in developing, testing, and evaluating the performance of mathematical models for predicting pollutant concentrations from smoking in indoor settings. Although largely overlooked by the regulatory community, these models provide regulators and risk assessors with practical tools for quantitatively estimating the exposure level that people receive indoors for a given level of smoking activity. This article reviews the development of the mass balance model and its application to predicting indoor pollutant concentrations from cigarette smoke and derives the time-averaged version of the model from the basic laws of conservation of mass. A simple table is provided of computed respirable particulate concentrations for any indoor location for which the active smoking count, volume, and concentration decay rate (deposition rate combined with air exchange rate) are known. Using the indoor ventilatory air exchange rate causes slightly higher indoor concentrations and therefore errs on the side of protecting health, since it excludes particle deposition effects, whereas using the observed particle decay rate gives a more accurate prediction of indoor concentrations. This table permits easy comparisons of indoor concentrations with air quality guidelines and indoor standards for different combinations of active smoking counts and air exchange rates. The published literature on mathematical models of environmental tobacco smoke also is reviewed and indicates that these models generally give good agreement between predicted concentrations and actual indoor measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10350523      PMCID: PMC1566285          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.99107s2375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  8 in total

1.  The simultaneous analysis of carbon monoxide and suspended particulate matter produced by cigarette smoking.

Authors:  S J Penkala; G de Oliveira
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Modeling indoor air concentrations near emission sources in imperfectly mixed rooms.

Authors:  E J Furtaw; M D Pandian; D R Nelson; J V Behar
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  A comparative study of environmental tobacco smoke particulate mass measurements in an environmental chamber.

Authors:  B J Ingebrethsen; D L Heavner; A L Angel; J M Conner; T J Steichen; C R Green
Journal:  JAPCA       Date:  1988-04

4.  Contribution to the assessment of exposure of nonsmokers to air pollution from cigarette and cigar smoke in occupied spaces.

Authors:  D P Bridge; M Corn
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide in the sidestream smoke from 15 brands of Canadian cigarettes.

Authors:  W S Rickert; J C Robinson; N Collishaw
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Indoor air pollution, tobacco smoke, and public health.

Authors:  J L Repace; A H Lowrey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Passive smoking increases experimental atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed rabbits.

Authors:  B Q Zhu; Y P Sun; R E Sievers; W M Isenberg; S A Glantz; W W Parmley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Validity of the uniform mixing assumption: determining human exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  N E Klepeis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of ETS exposure in hospitality workers who have never smoked.

Authors:  Stefanie Kolb; Ulrike Brückner; Dennis Nowak; Katja Radon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.984

2.  Summary: workshop on health risks attributable to ETS exposure in the workplace.

Authors:  M S Jaakkola; J M Samet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Validity of the uniform mixing assumption: determining human exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  N E Klepeis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  An introduction to the indirect exposure assessment approach: modeling human exposure using microenvironmental measurements and the recent National Human Activity Pattern Survey.

Authors:  N E Klepeis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Workshop summary: assessing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the workplace.

Authors:  J M Samet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and health risk assessment.

Authors:  M S Jaakkola; J M Samet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Exposure misclassification bias in studies of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer.

Authors:  A H Wu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Air pollution in Boston bars before and after a smoking ban.

Authors:  James L Repace; James N Hyde; Doug Brugge
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Electronic cigarettes and indoor air quality: a simple approach to modeling potential bystander exposures to nicotine.

Authors:  Stéphane Colard; Grant O'Connell; Thomas Verron; Xavier Cahours; John D Pritchard
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Environmental monitoring of secondhand smoke exposure.

Authors:  Benjamin J Apelberg; Lisa M Hepp; Erika Avila-Tang; Lara Gundel; S Katharine Hammond; Melbourne F Hovell; Andrew Hyland; Neil E Klepeis; Camille C Madsen; Ana Navas-Acien; James Repace; Jonathan M Samet; Patrick N Breysse
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.