Literature DB >> 8925388

Modeling indoor air concentrations near emission sources in imperfectly mixed rooms.

E J Furtaw1, M D Pandian, D R Nelson, J V Behar.   

Abstract

Assessments of exposure to indoor air pollutants usually employ spatially well-mixed models which assume homogeneous concentrations throughout a building or room. However, practical experience and experimental data indicate that concentrations are not uniform in rooms containing point sources of emissions; concentrations tend to be greater in close proximity to the source than they are further from it. This phenomenon could account for the observation that "personal air" monitors frequently yield higher concentrations than nearby microenvironmental monitors (i.e., the so-called "personal cloud" effect). In this project, we systematically studied the concentrations of a tracer gas at various distances from its emission source in a controlled-environment, room-size chamber under a variety of ventilation conditions. Measured concentrations in the proximity of the source deviated significantly above the predictions of a conventional well-mixed single-compartment mass balance model. The deviation was found to be a function of distance from the source and total room air flow rate. At typical air flow rates, the average concentration at arm's length (approximately 0.4 meters) from the source exceeds the theoretical well-mixed concentration by a ratio of about 2:1. However, this ratio is not constant; the monitored concentration appears to vary randomly from near the theoretical value to several times above it. Concentration data were fitted to a two-compartment model with the source located in a small virtual compartment within the room compartment. These two compartments were linked with a stochastic air transfer rate parameter. The resulting model provides a more realistic simulation of exposure concentrations than does the well-mixed model for assessing exposure to emissions from active sources. Parameter values are presented for using the enhanced model in a variety of typical situations.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8925388     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.1996.10467522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  9 in total

1.  Stochastic modeling of short-term exposure close to an air pollution source in a naturally ventilated room: an autocorrelated random walk method.

Authors:  Kai-Chung Cheng; Viviana Acevedo-Bolton; Ruo-Ting Jiang; Neil E Klepeis; Wayne R Ott; Peter K Kitanidis; Lynn M Hildemann
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Indoor particle dynamics in a school office: determination of particle concentrations, deposition rates and penetration factors under naturally ventilated conditions.

Authors:  X C Cong; J J Zhao; Z Jing; Q G Wang; P F Ni
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 3.  Benzene exposure: an overview of monitoring methods and their findings.

Authors:  Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.192

4.  Validity of the uniform mixing assumption: determining human exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  N E Klepeis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Mathematical models for predicting indoor air quality from smoking activity.

Authors:  W R Ott
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Electronic cigarettes and indoor air quality: a simple approach to modeling potential bystander exposures to nicotine.

Authors:  Stéphane Colard; Grant O'Connell; Thomas Verron; Xavier Cahours; John D Pritchard
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Modeling Clothing as a Vector for Transporting Airborne Particles and Pathogens across Indoor Microenvironments.

Authors:  Jacob Kvasnicka; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Jeffrey A Siegel; James A Scott; Miriam L Diamond
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 8.  Assessing exposure to air toxics relative to asthma.

Authors:  Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Method to Reduce Aerosolized Contaminant Concentration Exposure to Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic when Temporary Isolation Systems Are Required.

Authors:  Bert A Silich
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-10-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.