Literature DB >> 10343788

The depth-of-field of the human eye from objective and subjective measurements.

S Marcos1, E Moreno, R Navarro.   

Abstract

The depth-of-field (DOF) measured through psychophysical methods seems to depend on the target's characteristics. We use objective and subjective methods to determine the DOF of the eye for different pupil diameters and wavelengths in three subjects. Variation of image quality with focus is evaluated with a double-pass technique. Objective DOF is defined as the dioptric range for which the image quality does not change appreciably, based on optical criteria. Subjective DOF is based on the accuracy of focusing a point source. Additional DOFs are obtained by simulation from experimental wavefront aberration data from the same subjects. Objective and subjective measurements of DOF are only slightly affected by pupil size, wavelength and spectral composition. Comparison of DOF from double-pass and wavefront aberration data allows us to evaluate the role of ocular aberrations and Stiles-Crawford effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343788     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00317-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  28 in total

1.  Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jit B Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Aberrations of chick eyes during normal growth and lens induction of myopia.

Authors:  Marsha L Kisilak; Melanie C W Campbell; Jennifer J Hunter; Elizabeth L Irving; Lan Huang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Effects of interactions among wave aberrations on optical image quality.

Authors:  J S McLellan; P M Prieto; S Marcos; S A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Fluctuations in intraocular pressure and the potential effect on aberrations of the eye.

Authors:  M Asejczyk-Widlicka; B K Pierscionek
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Impact of the optical depth of field on cytogenetic image quality.

Authors:  Yuchen Qiu; Xiaodong Chen; Yuhua Li; Bin Zheng; Shibo Li; Wei R Chen; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 6.  Autonomic control of the eye.

Authors:  David H McDougal; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.090

7.  Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-González; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Determining the accommodative response from wavefront aberrations.

Authors:  Janice Tarrant; Austin Roorda; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The effect of phenylephrine on the ciliary muscle and accommodation.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Melissa D Bailey; Loraine T Sinnott; Chiu-Yen Kao; Karla Zadnik; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  The effects of longitudinal chromatic aberration and a shift in the peak of the middle-wavelength sensitive cone fundamental on cone contrast.

Authors:  F J Rucker; D Osorio
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.