Literature DB >> 10341935

Aftereffect of high-speed motion.

F A Verstraten1, M J van der Smagt, W A van de Grind.   

Abstract

A visual illusion known as the motion aftereffect is considered to be the perceptual manifestation of motion sensors that are recovering from adaptation. This aftereffect can be obtained for a specific range of adaptation speeds with its magnitude generally peaking for speeds around 3 deg s-1. The classic motion aftereffect is usually measured with a static test pattern. Here, we measured the magnitude of the motion aftereffect for a large range of velocities covering also higher speeds, using both static and dynamic test patterns. The results suggest that at least two (sub)populations of motion-sensitive neurons underlie these motion aftereffects. One population shows itself under static test conditions and is dominant for low adaptation speeds, and the other is prevalent under dynamic test conditions after adaptation to high speeds. The dynamic motion aftereffect can be perceived for adaptation speeds up to three times as fast as the static motion aftereffect. We tested predictions that follow from the hypothesised division in neuronal substrates. We found that for exactly the same adaptation conditions (oppositely directed transparent motion with different speeds), the aftereffect direction differs by 180 degrees depending on the test pattern. The motion aftereffect is opposite to the pattern moving at low speed when the test pattern is static, and opposite to the high-speed pattern for a dynamic test pattern. The determining factor is the combination of adaptation speed and type of test pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10341935     DOI: 10.1068/p271055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

1.  Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages.

Authors:  W A van de Grind; P van Hof; M J van der Smagt; F A Verstraten
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The quantitative use of velocity information in fast interception.

Authors:  Marc H E de Lussanet; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  A review of visual aftereffects in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Steven M Silverstein; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  The motion aftereffect reloaded.

Authors:  George Mather; Andrea Pavan; Gianluca Campana; Clara Casco
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Visual stability and the motion aftereffect: a psychophysical study revealing spatial updating.

Authors:  Ulrich Biber; Uwe J Ilg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Interaction effects of visual stimulus speed and contrast on postural sway.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten; Stella F Donker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique.

Authors:  Satoshi Shioiri; Kazumichi Matsumiya; Chia-Huei Tseng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Motion extrapolation in the High-Phi illusion: Analogous but dissociable effects on perceived position and perceived motion.

Authors:  Philippa Johnson; Sidney Davies; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Motion perception: a review of developmental changes and the role of early visual experience.

Authors:  Batsheva Hadad; Sivan Schwartz; Daphne Maurer; Terri L Lewis
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.