Literature DB >> 33597567

Contribution of the slow motion mechanism to global motion revealed by an MAE technique.

Satoshi Shioiri1,2, Kazumichi Matsumiya3,4, Chia-Huei Tseng5,4.   

Abstract

Two different motion mechanisms have been identified with motion aftereffect (MAE). (1) A slow motion mechanism, accessed by a static MAE, is sensitive to high-spatial and low-temporal frequency; (2) a fast motion mechanism, accessed by a flicker MAE, is sensitive to low-spatial and high-temporal frequency. We examined their respective responses to global motion after adapting to a global motion pattern constructed of multiple compound Gabor patches arranged circularly. Each compound Gabor patch contained two gratings at different spatial frequencies (0.53 and 2.13 cpd) drifting in opposite directions. The participants reported the direction and duration of the MAE for a variety of global motion patterns. We discovered that static MAE durations depended on the global motion patterns, e.g., longer MAE duration to patches arranged to see rotation than to random motion (Exp 1), and increase with global motion strength (patch number in Exp 2). In contrast, flicker MAEs durations are similar across different patterns and adaptation strength. Further, the global integration occurred at the adaptation stage, rather than at the test stage (Exp 3). These results suggest that slow motion mechanism, assessed by static MAE, integrate motion signals over space while fast motion mechanisms do not, at least under the conditions used.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33597567     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82900-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  50 in total

1.  Global motion adaptation.

Authors:  A T Smith; N E Scott-Samuel; K D Singh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Tracking the apparent location of targets in interpolated motion.

Authors:  S Shioiri; P Cavanagh; T Miyamoto; H Yaguchi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Detection of relative and uniform motion.

Authors:  Satoshi Shioiri; Sadanori Ito; Kentaro Sakurai; Hirohisa Yaguchi
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing.

Authors:  Duje Tadin; Joseph S Lappin; Lee A Gilroy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Advancement of motion psychophysics: review 2001-2010.

Authors:  Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Motion parallax driven by head movements: conditions for visual stability, perceived depth, and perceived concomitant motion.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ono; Hiroyasu Ujike
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 7.  Motion psychophysics: 1985-2010.

Authors:  David Burr; Peter Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  A short-range process in apparent motion.

Authors:  O Braddick
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Disparity detectors in human depth perception: evidence for directional selectivity.

Authors:  D Regan; K I Beverley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Motion aftereffect: a global mechanism for the perception of rotation.

Authors:  P Cavanagh; O E Favreau
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.