Literature DB >> 10333009

Inactivation of interposed nuclei in the cat: classically conditioned withdrawal reflexes, voluntary limb movements and the action primitive hypothesis.

V Bracha1, F P Kolb, K B Irwin, J R Bloedel.   

Abstract

The cerebellar interposed nuclei are considered critical components of circuits controlling the classical conditioning of eyeblink responses in several mammalian species. The main purpose of the present experiments was to examine whether the interposed nuclei are also involved in the control of classically conditioned withdrawal responses in other skeletomuscular effector systems. To achieve this objective, a unique learning paradigm was developed to examine classically conditioned withdrawal responses in three effector systems (the eyelid, forelimb and hindlimb) in individual cats. Trained animals were injected with muscimol in the cerebellar interposed nuclei, and the effects on the three conditioned responses (CRs) were examined. Although the effects of muscimol were less dramatic than previously reported in the rabbit eyeblink preparation, the inactivation of the cerebellar nuclei affected the performance of CRs in all three effector systems. In additional experiments, animals were injected with muscimol at the sites affecting classically conditioned withdrawal responses to determine the effects of these injections on reaching and locomotion behaviors. These tests demonstrated that the same regions of the cerebellar interposed nuclei which control withdrawal reflexes are also involved in the control of limb flexion and precision placement of the paw during both locomotion and reaching tasks. The obtained data indicate that the interposed nuclei are involved in the control of ipsilateral action primitives and that inactivating the interposed nuclei affects several modes of action of these functional units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10333009     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Functional relations of cerebellar modules of the cat.

Authors:  Kris M Horn; Milton Pong; Alan R Gibson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Consensus paper: current views on the role of cerebellar interpositus nucleus in movement control and emotion.

Authors:  Vincenzo Perciavalle; Richard Apps; Vlastislav Bracha; José M Delgado-García; Alan R Gibson; Maria Leggio; Andrew J Carrel; Nadia Cerminara; Marinella Coco; Agnès Gruart; Raudel Sánchez-Campusano
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  An adaptive filter model of cerebellar zone C3 as a basis for safe limb control?

Authors:  Paul Dean; Sean Anderson; John Porrill; Henrik Jörntell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Role of cerebellar interpositus nucleus in the genesis and control of reflex and conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  Lydia Jiménez-Díaz; Juan de Dios Navarro-López; Agnès Gruart; José M Delgado-García
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Classically conditioned postural reflex in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  F P Kolb; S Lachauer; M Maschke; D Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Comparison of the classically conditioned withdrawal reflex in cerebellar patients and healthy control subjects during stance: I. electrophysiological characteristics.

Authors:  D Timmann; T Kaulich; W Föhre; D F Kutz; M Gerwig; F P Kolb
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 7.  The Cerebellar Nuclei and Dexterous Limb Movements.

Authors:  Ayesha R Thanawalla; Albert I Chen; Eiman Azim
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  The cerebellum and eye-blink conditioning: learning versus network performance hypotheses.

Authors:  V Bracha; S Zbarska; K Parker; A Carrel; G Zenitsky; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Motor learning of mice lacking cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  M Elena Porras-García; Rocío Ruiz; Eva M Pérez-Villegas; José Á Armengol
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.856

10.  Abnormal cerebellar function and tremor in a mouse model for non-manifesting partially penetrant dystonia type 6.

Authors:  Meike E van der Heijden; Dominic J Kizek; Ross Perez; Elena K Ruff; Michelle E Ehrlich; Roy V Sillitoe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.