Literature DB >> 10328791

Risk-sensitive foraging: choice behaviour of honeybees in response to variability in volume of reward.

.   

Abstract

We tested risk sensitivity towards variability in volume of reward with harnessed honeybees, Apis mellifera, in a proboscis-extension conditioning paradigm. We conditioned each subject to turn its head and extend its proboscis towards one of two presented odours; one odour was associated with a constant reward volume and the other with a variable reward volume that was either low or high, with probabilities P=0.75 and (1-P)=0.25, respectively. The volumes of rewards were varied among three experimental conditions. In conditions I and II, the variable reward option included a low reward of zero (i.e. reinforcement was withheld in the low reward value); in condition I, the mean of the variable and of the constant reward options were the same, and in condition II, the variable reward option had a higher mean reward than the constant reward option. The behaviour of subjects did not differ between treatments and the majority of individuals were risk averse. In condition III, the variable reward option did not include a zero reward and the mean reward did not differ between options. Very few of the individuals assigned to condition III developed a preference for either reward option. Thus, honeybees are risk sensitive to variability in volume of reward in some conditions and the degree of risk sensitivity depends on characteristics of the reward distributions. The most salient characteristic may be a relative measure of variability, such as the value of the coefficient of variation of reward. The experimental paradigm that we developed is a powerful tool for studying the mechanism of risk sensitivity in bees, as well as other aspects of learning, decision making, perception and memory. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10328791     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  18 in total

1.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  A new look at risk-taking: using a translational approach to examine risk-taking behavior on the balloon analogue risk task.

Authors:  Kelly S DeMartini; Robert F Leeman; William R Corbin; Benjamin A Toll; Lisa M Fucito; Carl W Lejuez; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Nesting ecology does not explain slow-fast cognitive differences among honeybee species.

Authors:  Catherine Tait; Axel Brockmann; Dhruba Naug
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  A social insect perspective on the evolution of social learning mechanisms.

Authors:  Ellouise Leadbeater; Erika H Dawson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Foraging strategies and physiological adaptations in large carpenter bees.

Authors:  Hema Somanathan; Preeti Saryan; G S Balamurali
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.

Authors:  Patrick Anselme
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

7.  Analyses of avocado (Persea americana) nectar properties and their perception by honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  O Afik; A Dag; Z Kerem; S Shafir
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Associative olfactory learning of honeybees to differential rewards in multiple contexts--effect of odor component and mixture similarity.

Authors:  Nitzan Paldi; Shirit Zilber; Sharoni Shafir
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Learning reward expectations in honeybees.

Authors:  Mariana Gil; Rodrigo J De Marco; Randolf Menzel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Gambling for Gatorade: risk-sensitive decision making for fluid rewards in humans.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.