Literature DB >> 33907939

Nesting ecology does not explain slow-fast cognitive differences among honeybee species.

Catherine Tait1, Axel Brockmann2, Dhruba Naug3.   

Abstract

Slow-fast behavioral and life history differences have been tied to slow-fast variation in cognition that is part of the general speed-accuracy tradeoff. While there is growing evidence for such cognitive variation and its association with behavior and life history at the intraspecific level, it is unknown if a similar relationship extends to the interspecific level. Since interspecific differences in cognition have been shown to be a function of ecology and life history, such differences should be reflected in multiple traits that comprise the slow-fast cognitive axis. In this study, by measuring multiple cognitive traits in individuals, we tested for differences in the cognitive phenotype among four honeybee species, which differ in their behavior and life history in a manner that is associated with differences in their nesting ecology. Our results indicate that a set of cognitive traits consistently covary within each species, resulting in slow and fast cognitive phenotypes that largely meet the predictions of the speed-accuracy tradeoff. We also find that the four species group into two distinct clusters on a slow-fast cognitive axis, although their positions do not align with the known differences in their life history and nesting ecology. We instead find that cognitive differences among the four species are correlated with their brain size. We discuss the possible implications of these results for the role of ecology on slow-fast cognitive differences and the evolution of cognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition; Cognitive phenotype; Cognitive variation; Honeybees; Slow–fast interspecific differences

Year:  2021        PMID: 33907939     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01515-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  20 in total

1.  Worms under cover: relationships between performance in learning tasks and personality in great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Mathieu Amy; Kees van Oers; Marc Naguib
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates.

Authors:  Robert O Deaner; Karin Isler; Judith Burkart; Carel van Schaik
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Are animal personality traits linked to life-history productivity?

Authors:  Peter A Biro; Judy A Stamps
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Are bigger brains better?

Authors:  Lars Chittka; Jeremy Niven
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Cognition and personality: an analysis of an emerging field.

Authors:  Andrea S Griffin; Lauren M Guillette; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Insect societies and the social brain.

Authors:  Sarah M Farris
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.186

7.  Development and experience lead to increased volume of subcompartments of the honeybee mushroom body.

Authors:  C Durst; S Eichmüller; R Menzel
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1994-11

8.  Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  M E Bitterman; R Menzel; A Fietz; S Schäfer
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 9.  How Can We Study the Evolution of Animal Minds?

Authors:  Maxime Cauchoix; Alexis S Chaine
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-15

10.  Taking a comparative approach: analysing personality as a multivariate behavioural response across species.

Authors:  Alecia J Carter; William E Feeney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.